tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18551554688383549122024-02-20T00:22:53.036-08:00Psychiatry and the Business of Madness Reviews Reviews of Dr. Bonnie Burstow's <i> Psychiatry and the Business of Madness </i>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1855155468838354912.post-27929384866623094412016-02-06T09:29:00.000-08:002016-02-06T09:29:02.358-08:00Review from the Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, Vol 5, No 1<h1 style="background-color: #f5f5e4; color: #1f1f1f; font-family: Cambria, 'Times New Roman', sans-serif !important; font-size: 12pt !important; line-height: 28px; margin-bottom: 3px; text-align: center;">
Burstow, B. (2015). <span class="referenced-work-name" style="font-style: italic;">Psychiatry and the Business of Madness: An Ethical and Epistemological Accounting</span>. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.<br />ISBN: 978-1-137-50384-8.</h1>
<h2 style="background-color: #f5f5e4; color: #1f1f1f; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 12pt !important; line-height: 28px; margin: 0em 1em 3px 0em; padding-top: 0.5em; text-align: center;">
Reviewed by Jennifer Poole, Zachary Sera Grant & Katherina Yerro<br style="font-family: Cambria, 'Times New Roman', sans-serif !important;" />School of Social Work, Ryerson University<br style="font-family: Cambria, 'Times New Roman', sans-serif !important;" />jpoole [at] ryerson [dot] ca</h2>
<div style="background-color: #f5f5e4; color: #1f1f1f; font-family: Cambria, 'Times New Roman', sans-serif !important; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 20px;">
Original Article: http://cjds.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/cjds/article/view/260/474</div>
<div style="background-color: #f5f5e4; color: #1f1f1f; font-family: Cambria, 'Times New Roman', sans-serif !important; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 20px;">
It is rare to come across a scholarly book that one cannot put down. It is rare to come across a book that unequivocally demands we step “outside the circle of certainty” (2) around “mental” “illness” and “care.” This is such a book, and in it we have a clear argument for what psychiatry has become, what it is capable of, and how this all came to pass.</div>
<div style="background-color: #f5f5e4; color: #1f1f1f; font-family: Cambria, 'Times New Roman', sans-serif !important; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 20px;">
We have heard echoes of this argument from scholars situated in the fields of anti-psychiatry, critical mental health, and Mad studies. Yet, for us, three social work scholars at various stages of our careers, the breadth and depth of Burstow’s accounting is not only spectacular but new. In a clear and accessible way, Burstow takes us through personal, historical, narrative, institutional, economic, political, and discursive landscapes. She shows us how each is a part of her particular “study of psychiatry” (1) and “all that surrounds it” including governments, the legal system and “mechanisms of enforcement” (2). Importantly, she shows us what the consequences of it all have been on our friends, family members, colleagues, and ourselves. Burstow is not afraid to question the whole mental health system, and how it has come to be that “people believe what medical doctors state and what medicinal doctors recommend” (3). Boldly, she asks, “what if this were not legitimate medicine…what if psychiatry’s fundamental tenets and conceptualizations were inherently faulty? Indeed, what if – despite some helpful practitioners – it does far more harm than good” (1)?</div>
<div style="background-color: #f5f5e4; color: #1f1f1f; font-family: Cambria, 'Times New Roman', sans-serif !important; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 20px;">
We have long suspected the same, and so we welcomed Burstow’s accounting. With such a book there is much to be made of all her arguments, but for us, certain sections stand out more than others. Of note were Chapters 2 and 3 which we see as difficult but mandatory reading for those interested in the history of psychiatry, “mental health,” and “helping.” In the former, Burstow takes us back to classical times, to witch hunts, to the power of the Catholic Church, the birth of psychiatry and its terminology and classification system. We enjoyed Burstow’s take on Pinel, usually presented as a hero for unchaining the mad. She writes, “what we have with Pinel, in other words, is not the end to brutality as professed but a more subtle form of brutality” (35) and one tied up in “confinement on an unprecedented scale” (44). Chapter 3 is a terrifying tour of modernity, as well as the challenge of psychoanalysis, psychiatry’s role in eugenics, the Holocaust and of course the pharmaceutical revolution. As Burstow notes in her conclusions, images from these chapters continued to haunt us long after we closed the book.</div>
<div style="background-color: #f5f5e4; color: #1f1f1f; font-family: Cambria, 'Times New Roman', sans-serif !important; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 20px;">
We must also commend Burstow’s detailed discussion of the <abbr title="Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders">DSM</abbr> in Chapter 4, and the utility of her demonstration of how “things” come to be included or not in this oh so powerful text: “Criteria sets pathologize the everyday [e.g., General Anxiety Disorder] and … routinely pathologize deviance [see Oppositional Defiant Disorder, Schizophrenia, Borderline Personality Disorder], they are blatantly sexist, racist, classist, transphobic” (92). In this chapter, we are also gratefully reminded that, “No biological sign has ever been found for any ‘mental disorder.’ Correspondingly, there is no known physiological etiology” (75).</div>
<div style="background-color: #f5f5e4; color: #1f1f1f; font-family: Cambria, 'Times New Roman', sans-serif !important; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 20px;">
Similarly, Chapter 5 on the “beast” that is psychiatric “care” had personal resonance for us as did Chapter 6 on the co-option and “hooking” of the professional. We nodded in recognition at what professionals tell themselves to rationalize clinical decisions and the nursing interviewee who admitted, “I can’t do this anymore…I tried to speak up, but the power of the script is too big for me” (143). And then there are the chapters on “pharmageddon” (Chapter 7) and electroshock (Chapter 8). Even for those of us who might be familiar with this content through multiple encounters with the “system,” these are troubling chapters, for they detail how these “treatments” come to be approved and how they “work,” including the cherry picking that goes on in clinical trials, the silencing of adverse effects, the lack of testing on <abbr title="electroconvulsive therapy">ECT</abbr>and the admission that <abbr title="electroconvulsive therapy">ECT</abbr> produces results similar to brain injury.</div>
<div style="background-color: #f5f5e4; color: #1f1f1f; font-family: Cambria, 'Times New Roman', sans-serif !important; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 20px;">
We must also note that Burstow has created one of the best examples we know of institutional ethnography (<abbr title="institutional ethnography">IE</abbr>). “A culmination of decades of research” (16), the book is based on 119 interviews as well as analysis of hundreds of documents and observations (p. 16). Although she also includes other forms of research such as critical discourse analysis, after reading this book we have the sense that this is how we “should” be doing <abbr title="institutional ethnography">IE</abbr>. Citing Smith (2005, 2006) and staying true to the language and process of <abbr title="institutional ethnography">IE</abbr> (i.e. regime, problematic, boss text), Burstow offers the reader many a “point of disjuncture” (3), showing us how to then go “where the documents point” (10).</div>
<div style="background-color: #f5f5e4; color: #1f1f1f; font-family: Cambria, 'Times New Roman', sans-serif !important; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 20px;">
Indeed, this book is a detailed <abbr title="institutional ethnography">IE</abbr> account of the strangle-hold psychiatry has on so many. We believe this text should be core reading for anyone in the helping professions who is unaware of or has forgotten how psychiatry controls and manipulates those under its authority. As service users, we appreciated being able to relate to stories of other survivors included in the text. As educators and students, we appreciated all the effort that Burstow has put into this brilliant new text.</div>
<div style="background-color: #f5f5e4; color: #1f1f1f; font-family: Cambria, 'Times New Roman', sans-serif !important; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 20px;">
However, we do have questions.</div>
<div style="background-color: #f5f5e4; color: #1f1f1f; font-family: Cambria, 'Times New Roman', sans-serif !important; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 20px;">
While we believe this book to be a much needed compilation of the intersectional oppression of psychiatry, some of us struggled with a general lack of suggestions for our own critical mental health work. If, as Burstow asks, there must be a better way, we need more details on what that way is. Agreed, compassion is central, as is listening, believing, and working together in “the commons,” but how do we get there? How do we start on that path? Who can make this happen?</div>
<div style="background-color: #f5f5e4; color: #1f1f1f; font-family: Cambria, 'Times New Roman', sans-serif !important; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 20px;">
Secondly, after reading this book some of us are also troubled by an even greater fear of psychiatry. In the words of one interviewee in the book, “we have seen psychologists mysteriously disappear… there is a real fear of saying anything against the grain, let alone coming out against a treatment” (156). When do we speak up against psychiatry? How do we speak up? Can we, as Burstow notes, take down the system a la “Trojan horse”? It is far easier for those with tenure, with social and educational capital, with stable housing and white privilege to ask the questions than those starting out in this work, living with debt and precarity, as well as with oppressions such as transphobia, heteronormativity and racism.</div>
<div style="background-color: #f5f5e4; color: #1f1f1f; font-family: Cambria, 'Times New Roman', sans-serif !important; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 20px;">
We also had questions about how Burstow problematizes so much psychiatric language in the book but, in Chapter 5, does not do the same with “eating disorders.” To write “like many a young woman in this society, she is anorexic” (135) is not only counter-productive but demonstrates the author’s own “institutional capture” (another <abbr title="institutional ethnography">IE</abbr> term). While we do not believe Burstow intended to make an overarching judgment about women in society, we do believe it to be an excellent example of how psychiatry functions, when a leading anti-psychiatry activist, in a book about psychiatry as a means of social control, can themselves make a statement which perpetuates, in her words, the “misogyny” (95) ever present in the<abbr title="Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders">DSM</abbr>.</div>
<div style="background-color: #f5f5e4; color: #1f1f1f; font-family: Cambria, 'Times New Roman', sans-serif !important; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 20px;">
As well, many readers of this book may be left wondering about Burstow’s focus “on the west” (22) and the inadvertent centering of all things western, including whiteness. Although there are sections where race and racism are taken up (see Chapter 2 for instance), there is very minimal attention given to colonialism and “all that surrounds it” vis-a-vis psychiatry. Although Burstow takes up what she calls “Aboriginal worldviews” in her final chapter envisioning a “eutopian” world, it is a cursory mention, without credit to any particular scholar, elder, teacher, or nation. And at this time, in this place, we see this exclusion, this de-centering, as colonialism once more. Cannot settlers, even expressly anti-psychiatry settlers, do better?</div>
<div style="background-color: #f5f5e4; color: #1f1f1f; font-family: Cambria, 'Times New Roman', sans-serif !important; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 20px;">
Finally, we are left with a question of what does this book offer disability scholars? While there is no mention of critical disability studies per se, Burstow does cite and include multiple references to scholars important to disability work and especially that which takes a critical look at “mental disability.” LeFrancois, co-editor of the Canadian Mad Studies collection <span class="referenced-work-name" style="font-style: italic;">Mad Matters</span> is both interviewed for the book as well as cited as a scholar, as is Chris Chapman and Irit Shimrat. Burstow also locates her work in a tradition of critical scholars such as Szaz, Foucault, and Fanon “committed to revealing what might be called the hidden face of psychiatry” (20). To this list she adds feminist scholars Chesler, Showalter, and Caplan, as well as Erick Fabris (2011). But it is Peter Breggin (1983, 1979) and David Healy (2009) who are especially referenced throughout. Clearly, this situates Burstow’s argument alongside a more classic canon rather than a contemporary Crip commentary. And we could not help but wonder what scholars such as China Mills, scholars troubling psychiatry <em>and</em> colonialism, might make of this particular orientation.</div>
<div style="background-color: #f5f5e4; color: #1f1f1f; font-family: Cambria, 'Times New Roman', sans-serif !important; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 20px;">
Struggles and questions aside, this is an important book. It made us question a good deal of what we “know”; personally and professionally, and we have already recommended it to colleagues, friends, and students. Gratefully, we are left with even more questions about the system, about those who find psychiatry helpful, and about what is next, both for Burstow, and for us.</div>
<h3 style="background-color: #f5f5e4; color: #1f1f1f; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 12pt !important; line-height: 28px; margin: 0em 1em 3px 0em; padding-top: 0.75em;">
References</h3>
<ul id="references" style="background-color: #f5f5e4; color: #1f1f1f; font-family: Cambria, 'Times New Roman', sans-serif !important; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; list-style: none; margin: 0.25em 0px 4px; padding: 0px 40px; text-indent: 20px;">
<li style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 24px; margin-bottom: 8px; text-indent: -20px;"><div style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 0px;">
Breggin, P. (1979). <span class="referenced-work-name" style="font-style: italic;">Electroshock: Its brain-disabling effects</span>. New York: Springer</div>
</li>
<li style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 24px; margin-bottom: 8px; text-indent: -20px;"><div style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 0px;">
Breggin, P. (1983). <span class="referenced-work-name" style="font-style: italic;">Psychiatric drugs: Hazards to the brain</span>. New York: Springer</div>
</li>
<li style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 24px; margin-bottom: 8px; text-indent: -20px;"><div style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 0px;">
Fabris, E. (2011). <span class="referenced-work-name" style="font-style: italic;">Tranquil prisons</span>. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.</div>
</li>
<li style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 24px; margin-bottom: 8px; text-indent: -20px;"><div style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 0px;">
Healy, D. (2009). <span class="referenced-work-name" style="font-style: italic;">Psychiatric drugs explained</span>. London: Elsevier.</div>
</li>
<li style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 24px; margin-bottom: 8px; text-indent: -20px;"><div style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 0px;">
Lefrancois, B., Menzies, R. and Reaume, G. (2013). <span class="referenced-work-name" style="font-style: italic;">Mad matters: A critical reader in Canadian mad studies</span>. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.</div>
</li>
<li style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 24px; margin-bottom: 8px; text-indent: -20px;"><div style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 0px;">
Smith, D. (2005). <span class="referenced-work-name" style="font-style: italic;">Institutional ethnography: A sociology for the people</span>. Landham, MD: Altamira Press.</div>
</li>
<li style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 24px; margin-bottom: 8px; text-indent: -20px;"><div style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-top: 1em; text-indent: 0px;">
Smith, D. (2006). Institutional ethnography as practice: Landham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.</div>
</li>
</ul>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1855155468838354912.post-91232897671982895342015-12-13T08:27:00.001-08:002015-12-13T08:27:38.800-08:00Review from Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry 17.1 (2015): 76-80.<div class="display_record_text_copy ltr rtl-Link" id="fulltext_field_prod.academic_MSTAR_1718301717" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #555555; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px;">
<div class="t-zone" id="fullTextZoneId" style="background: none !important; box-sizing: border-box;">
<text htmlcontent="true" style="box-sizing: border-box;" wordcount="2638"><div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
Psychiatry and the Business of Madness: An Ethical and Epistemological Accounting. Bonnie Burstow. London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015, 316 pp., $40.00 (paperback) $95.00 (hardcover).</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
This book is arguably the most comprehensive and brilliant critique of psychiatry that I've ever read; it's a devastating expose of psychiatry's discredited medical model and institutional psychiatry, "a regime of ruling." Bonnie Burstow's book is absolutely awesome in its numerous, thoroughly researched facts and original insights and scholarship frequently voiced with passion. Burstow uses the research analytic tool of institutional ethnography-"ruling happens through texts, particularly through the activation of texts" (p. 18). With this powerful intellectual probe, she deconstructs "boss texts" and takes us on an incredible journey into psychiatry, its alarming methods of social control, its intrusive brain-damaging drugs and electroshock. Burstow ends this awesome work in the spirit of hope and humanity she calls "Eutopia," a vision of a better world of compassion, empathy, mutual caring, respect for freedom and human rights.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
She begins with a short and concise history of psychiatry featuring mad doctors and "alienists" (an apt word) during the 18th century, including Philippe Pinel who unchained poor people with mental illness in a Paris asylum but instituted a reign of terror of close surveillance and control. In the 19th century, there's Benjamin Rush, the notorious "father of American psychiatry" whose face appears on the American Psychiatric Association's logo; he invented the traumatic "tranquilizer chair" and advocated fear as therapeutic; he also labeled black slaves with the disease of "drapetomania," running away to be free; he also committed his son to an insane asylum. The gentler "moral treatment/moral management" of country retreats in the late 18th and early 19th centuries soon died; by the late 19th and early 20th century, it was replaced with eugenics/genetics-based, physically intrusive biological psychiatry, which unfortunately dominates today. This is a small but telling fragment of psychiatry's dark history of social control, medical fraud, coercion, and violence.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
Burstow asserts that two fundamental principles underlie psychiatry and the book: parens patriae and police powers. Parens patriae (literally "father of the country") refers to power of the state to control, imprison, and forcibly treat citizens; police powers are mainly expressed as coercion, arrest, and use of force. Psychiatry, Burstow asserts, is essentially a regime of ruling; however, given psychiatry's hegemonic social control, the terms psychiatric dictatorship and psychiatric police state seem more appropriate.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
In Chapter 4 ("Probing the Boss Text: DSM-What? Whither? How? Which?"), Burstow brilliantly analyzes the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), psychiatry's bible of fraudulent diseases. Unlike medical diagnoses, the approximately 350 diagnostic labels in DSM-5 (the current edition) are not only subjective and unscientific but also frequently lead to serious life-changing consequences such as loss of freedom (involuntary commitment), psychiatric drugging, and/or electroshock (electroconvulsive therapy [ECT]). DSM labels, Burstow asserts, serve no medical or scientific purpose, instead they routinely marginalize and stigmatize. Burstow succinctly summarizes major problems of the DSM, "subjectivity . . . masquerading as objectivity . . . nothing less than the essence of who the person is . . . constitutes a disorder" (pp. 94-95). She calls this activating text a "patient-processing system," denounces it as having absolutely no scientific validity or reliability; like the late psychiatrist Thomas Szasz and other dissident health professionals, Burstow correctly states there is "no mental illness" because there is no biological or medical evidence of cellular disease in anybody labeled mentally ill. With surgical precision, she exposes the fraudulent nature of DSM diagnoses while examining constructs such as "personality disorder," "oppositional defiant disorder," "schizophrenia," and "attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)," all allegedly types of "brain disease" caused by the discredited "chemical imbalance" theory. What's going on here is irrationally medicalizing nonconformist behavior, in fact virtually any intense emotional state-for example, sadness or grief labeled "depression," joy labeled "hypomania," and most everyday problems as "mental disorders." The DSM is the modern equivalent of the Inquisition's Malleus Maleficarum, a medieval boss text of written instructions ("criteria" or "symptoms") designed to identify and demonize heretics and witches-today's "mental patients." In short, "human existence itself [is] . . . theorized as . . . a disorder" (pp. 89-90); "problems are located exclusively within the individual . . . something that conflicts with Aboriginal experience, not to mention that of most of the world" (p. 92). This is not medical diagnosis or "medical science," it's psychiatry-and-state-sponsored quackery.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
Another clear and important message is "psychiatry is an agent of the state." In this connection, Burstow examines relevant sections of Ontario's Mental Health Act (MHA; Chapter 5, "The Beast/Inside the Belly of the Beast: Pinioned by Paper"). Like virtually all mental health laws and regulations, the MHA legitimizes preventive detention as involuntary committal (incarcerating citizens without charge and public hearing or trial); it also falsely assumes that psychiatrists can predict dangerousness. As an example, Burstow cites these sweeping and vague criteria for involuntary committal:</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
The patient is suffering from mental disorder of a nature or quality that likely will result in:</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
(i) Serious bodily harm to the patient,</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
(ii) Serious bodily harm to another person, or</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
(iii) Serious physical impairment of the patient unless the patient remains in the custody of a psychiatric facility. (p. 107)</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
The term mental disorder is not specifically defined here or anywhere else in the act. Also, the term likely will result is a guesstimate, not medical evidence or scientific fact, because psychiatrists admit they cannot predict dangerousness; the term serious physical impairment is obviously, if not deliberately, vague and open to multiple interpretations. As ruling words, these criteria make it very easy for psychiatrists to label and lock up and chemically restrain (forcibly drug) innocent citizens for at least 72 hours under the "Observation and Assessment" provision in Form 1. The incarceration and forced drugging of Irit Shimrat, a close friend, courageous survivor, and author, is very relevant; her story is a frightening object lesson in psychiatric-and-state-sponsored coercion and violence (pp. 123-124). Compounding this injustice, during the initial "period of observation and assessment," the person cannot appeal or launch any legal action. Even more alarming, Burstow points out that people can also be involuntarily committed (lose their freedom) if they refuse to "take their meds," or if they've "previously received treatment or from a mental disorder . . . and likely to suffer substantial mental or physical deterioration or serious physical impairment" (p. 109). Again, this major term is not defined or explained. Equally alarming, the MHA greatly expands police powers such as authorizing police officers in Ontario the power to diagnose mental disorder, predict dangerousness, arrest, and forcibly transport citizens to psychiatric facilities for psychiatric examination mainly based on subjective belief:</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
A police officer has reasonable and probable grounds to believe that a person is acting or has acted in a disorderly manner and has reasonable cause to believe that the person,</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
(a) Has threatened or attempted or is threatening or attempting to cause bodily harm to himself or herself;</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
(b) Has behaved or is behaving violently toward another person and has caused or is causing another person to fear bodily harm from him or her; or</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
(c) Is showing a lack of competence to take care of himself or herself, and in addition the police officer that the person is apparently suffering from a mental disorder of a nature or quality that will likely result in,</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
(d) Serious bodily harm to the person,</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
(e) Serious bodily harm to another, or</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
(f) Serious physical impairment of the person.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
Burstow comments, " . . . evidence that officials are permitted to use in making their assessments includes not simply what they directly observe but also what is relayed by others. The 'mentally ill person' becomes 'an easy target.' People can be committed against their will simply because they are not taking their meds." Many survivors stop or try to stop taking antidepressants and/or neuroleptics (antipsychotics) for good reason-they can't tolerate the incredible suffering and disability the drugs cause (p. 110).</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
Once the person ends up in a psychiatric hospital or mental health center, he or she is subjected to more violence, what Burstow calls "cosmeticized violence . . . students are socialized to give and force damaging treatments on people". In the chapter "The Psychiatric Team," psychiatric and nursing staff violence inherent in physical restraints, forced drugging, and "seclusion" (solitary confinement), for example, is rationalized as self-defence from the perceived or imagined violence of patients "in need of control." In this environment ruled by a hierarchy of psychiatrists, psychologists, nurses, and social workers, violence serves a double purpose-control of patients and enforcement of unity among team members. In this controlled and controlling environment, whistleblowers are nonexistent; team solidarity trumps care, compassion, and empathy.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
"Marching to 'Pharmageddon': Polypharmacy Unmasked" (Chapter 7) is an important consciousness-raising object lesson on psychiatric drugs as a major method of social control. The brain-damaging effects of psychiatry's "safe and effective" neuroleptics (antipsychotics)-for example, blunting of emotions, apathy, indifference, cognitive impairment; so are akathisia, tardive dyskinesia, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and parkinsonism, all are clinical indications of brain damage sanitized as "side effects" of psychiatry's "safe and effective medication." Burstow draws heavily on the consciousnessraising critiques of dissident psychiatrist Peter Breggin, investigative journalist Robert Whitaker, and other independent researchers, as well as her own professional knowledge and experience. Although not a medical doctor, Burstow clearly and critically explains how these drugs, particularly the "atypical" neuroleptics such as Risperdal, Zyprexa, and Abilify that impact several parts of the brain; they seriously disrupt the neurotransmitter dopamine in the mesocortical and mesolimbic systems, invariably causing brain damage or chemical lobotomy. The antidepressants have similar if not more serious brain-damaging effects in addition to causing suicidal ideas, suicide attempts, mania, and sudden violence. The biological psychiatrists, Burstow asserts, falsely claim "chemical imbalance" or lack of dopamine in the brain as the major cause of schizophrenia, for example; psychiatrists, medical doctors, and researchers, largely funded by the drug companies (Big Pharma) continue ignoring the fact that psychiatric drugs cause this chemical imbalance and brain damage, including the tragic and disabling neurological disorders-an admission they're afraid to acknowledge. A person with a previous psychiatric history can be kept on psychiatric drugs virtually indefinitely, thanks to a community treatment order, another boss text that authorizes doctors, not just psychiatrists, to prescribe psychiatric drugs for years or indefinitely to patients after they're released to the community (see Tranquil Prisons by Erick Fabris). Under this draconian mental health law, refusal to "take their meds" can result in people being committed for longer periods. The transnational drug companies also come in for well-deserved criticism for their unscientific research and unethical marketing practices, including mislabeling and hiding many health-threatening effects of psychiatric drugs during clinical trials, major findings are often kept secret. Also, government regulators such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States and Health Canada are shown to be frequently incompetent and complicit in failing to fully warn and protect the public about high-risk drugs.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
Burstow is at her most critical in powerfully exposing and denouncing "Electroshock" (ECT), arguably psychiatry's most destructive procedure today, one that many shock survivors and activists have been protesting against for almost 40 years and want banned (Chapter 8). Contrary to popular belief following the film One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, ECT never stopped and never banned but has increased worldwide. Burstow accurately and concisely describes the ECT procedure involving sedative, muscle paralyzer ("muscle relaxant"), oxygen, and electricity; 1501 V are delivered from a shock machine to electrodes placed on one side (unilateral) or both sides (bilateral) of the brain. ECT always causes a grand mal seizure-dishonestly called therapeutic by shock promoters Richard Abrams, Max Fink, the American Psychiatric Association, and Canadian Psychiatric Association. Also, every ECT causes an immediate convulsion, coma, memory loss, and brain damage. Burstow bluntly and concisely comments,</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
Iatrogenically created dysfunction, Diminished capacity. Lobotomy-like unawareness. Anosognosia-the cognitive impairment that involves inability recognize that one is impaired Compliance itself. Euphoria caused by brain damage . . . after four weeks, this brain-damaging treatment is no more effective than placebo . . . people . . . are being brain-damaged for nothing . . . The most pervasive themes . . . are: memory loss; cognitive impairment; loss of skills, prospects, ability to function, connections itself, with diminishment of the person emerging as an overarching theme. (pp. 215, 224)</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
The American Psychiatric Association's promotional mantra that ECT is "safe and effective treatment" is directly challenged by several scientific studies that Burstow summarizes. For example, she succinctly explains the significance of Harold Sackeim's landmark comprehensive 2007 study in which he conclusively proves the brain-damaging and memory-destroying effects of electroshock-regardless of type or mode of ECT, placement of electrodes, age, and gender; as prime targets, women and the elderly suffer the greatest damage, reflecting sexist and ageist biases in ECT (pp. 212-213). Electroshock's many devastating and tragic effects come to life with excerpts of Burstow's interviews with several Canadian shock survivors and some of their personal testimony at the 2005 Enquiry into Psychiatry public hearings in Toronto. The statements by Connie, Wendy, and "C's" story are particularly memorable and riveting; they courageously speak truth to power (pp. 216-222).</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
As organizational-systemic analysis, Burstow's graphic illustrations of the "The ECT Empire" (p. 204) and "Rule by ECT Scholar/Capitalists" (p. 208) are original, accurate, and chilling in their details. They clearly show the interconnections and conflicts of interest among shock promoters such as Richard Abrams, Max Fink, and Richard Weiner with the American Psychiatric Association's task force reports, close links to journals, textbooks, shock machine manufacturers (e.g., somatics owned by proshock psychiatrist Richard Abrams), hospitals, and government regulators such as the FDA and Health Canada. Near the end of this chapter, these conclusions are worth quoting and remembering: "People's lives are essentially obliterated-erased" (p. 217).</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
The authorities most influential in framing psychiatry's position on ECT are themselves the arch capitalists who receive the primary benefit . . . the treatment is buoyed up by shoddy research and research flagrantly misrepresented . . . after four weeks, this brain-damaging treatment is no more effective than placebo . . . people . . . are being brain-damaged for nothing . . . The most pervasive themes . . . are: memory loss; cognitive impairment; loss of skills, prospects, ability to function, connection itself, with diminishment of the person emerging as an overarching theme. More psychological themes include: trauma, torture, and punishment. Control is of the essence. ECT . . . should not be paid for by our ministries of health, nor should it be offered by medical practitioners . . . [ECT] should be phased out. (p. 224)</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
Although no province, state, or country has officially banned ECT, there is worldwide resistance: The first International Day of Protest Against Electroshock, organized by three shock survivors, was held on May 16, 2015, in 28 cities in 6 or more countries including the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, New Zealand, Scotland, Ireland, Uruguay, and Chile.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
The antishock movement is obviously a major priority action in the antipsychiatry movement, which, hopefully, will spread globally as Burstow and other activists including myself advocate. If you're a psychiatric survivor, activist, supporter, or ally, Burstow urges you to ask yourself these three key questions:</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
1. If successful, will the actions or campaigns that we are contemplating move us closer to the long-range goal of psychiatry abolition?</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
2. Are they likely to avoid improving or giving added legitimacy to the current system?</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
3. Do they avoid "widening" psychiatry's net? (p. 258)</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
Thanks to Bonnie Burstow, this book moves us closer to the day when there will be no medical model of "mental illness," no electroshock, no psychiatry, but Eutopia-a world based on mutual caring, emotional and social support, empathy, respect for our human rights, and humanity.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: 700;">AuthorAffiliation</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div class="AuthorAffiliation_content" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
Don Weitz</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
Toronto, Ontario, Canada</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</text><div class="DocViewShowAll" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div class="wordCount" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
Word count: <span style="box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: 700;">2638</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="rs_skip" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #555555; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px;">
</div>
<div id="copyRightDiv" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #555555; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px;">
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 17px;">
Copyright Springer Publishing Company 2015</div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1855155468838354912.post-67151877310155526642015-11-04T06:22:00.000-08:002015-11-04T06:22:40.087-08:00Critical Mental Health Nurse's Network Review <article class="clearfix post-218 post type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-book-reviews" id="post-218" style="background-color: white; border-bottom-color: rgb(247, 247, 247); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 2px; color: #404040; font-family: 'PT Sans', sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 22.5px; margin: 0px 0px 40px; padding-bottom: 15px;"><header class="entry-header" style="float: right; max-width: 620px; width: 620px;"><h1 class="entry-title" style="border: 0px; clear: both; font-family: Lato, sans-serif; font-size: 2rem; line-height: 1.35; margin: 0px 0px 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 5px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<a href="http://criticalmhnursing.org/2015/07/20/bonnie-burstow-book-review/" rel="bookmark" style="border: 0px; color: #434343; font-family: inherit; font-size: 20px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s linear 0s; vertical-align: baseline;">Bonnie Burstow Book Review</a></h1>
</header><div class="entry-content" style="border: 0px; float: right; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; max-width: 620px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; width: 620px;">
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
The following post is a book review by Jonathan Gadsby. If you would like to review a book or write a response to a book, please let us know. We have a list of great books to recommend, or perhaps you have one that you want to introduce to us.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Our list of books and reviews/responses is eventually going to become part of a project that will follow from the conference on the 9th of September. We would like to build a section on this website that students, tutors, practicing nurses and others can turn to for critical reading: books, articles, links, videos etc, especially critical writing about nursing.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
_________________________________________________________________________</div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<b>Bonnie Burstow’s <i>Psychiatry and the Business of Madness: An Ethical and Epistemological Accounting</i></b><i> </i>(Palgrave Macmillan, April 2015), is a significant addition to literature surrounding the evidence and practices of psychiatry in the 21st Century. An ‘Institutional Ethnography’, the nine chapters cover the history and culture of psychiatry, the evidence for psychiatric treatments, the cultures of the different mental health professionals, the formation and logic of the DSM and diagnosis, extensive discussion about the research, dissemination and actions of various psychiatric medications and ECT. The text is laced with feminist perspectives and survivor experiences. It is set in North America, but it is clear in the text just how strikingly similar the issues frequently are to the mental health scene in the UK.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
This is not a book which picks apart aspects of mental health provision and makes suggestions for improvement. This is a book which describes psychiatry as a consequence of the state and a society driven by our fears, power and oppression, by the subjugation of women, non-whites, the rejections of all kinds of difference, the power of capital and machineries of misinformation which drench us in myths about progress. For Burstow, psychiatry cannot be understood as a branch of medicine or as any kind of science. She does not argue, as others have, that it is in need of a ‘paradigm shift’. Drawing on the influences of Thomas Szasz, RD Laing, Michel Foucault, Peter Breggin, Irving Goffman, David Healy and Robert Whitaker, this heavily referenced book is disturbing, personal and outrageous:</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: #f2f2f2; border: 0px; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-style: italic; font-weight: inherit; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 30px 10px 13px 18px; position: relative; quotes: "" ""; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
…what does “competence” even mean in a system such as this? How can we speak of competence when the entire industry is in the business of creating diseases and imbalance? Indeed, would anyone even be better off with a technically competent psychiatrist over a technically incompetent one? (p11)</div>
</blockquote>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<b>What is new?</b></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Some readers may feel that there is not very much here that is new, even while perhaps admiring the writing. Perhaps it is a little disingenuous to complain of this, for it is very clear that psychiatry, her subject, has been repeating old and discredited arguments for a long time. For me, there were several aspects which are, if not exactly new, then less familiar or which contained a fresh angle.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
I had read before that psychiatry in the 20th Century was more widely interested with eugenics than might be generally known. Under Burstow, psychiatry and eugenics are long-time associates, and notions of heredity which pervade our thinking today originate there (p50). Psychiatry is described not as the unfortunate profession that was caught up in the fascist dogma of Nazism, but as the true architects of the Holocaust (p48), and neither was their influence limited to Germany, with concepts of degeneration and sterilisation widespread, especially in the USA. Burstow sees this not as a dark moment in psychiatry’s history, but intrinsic to the logic of distress attributed to biological origins:</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: #f2f2f2; border: 0px; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-style: italic; font-weight: inherit; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 30px 10px 13px 18px; position: relative; quotes: "" ""; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Nazi Germany, according to its own postulates, was biocracy…. Psychiatry is in its own right a biocracy complete with incarceral capacities and police powers. In both instances, ruling is predicated on biological differences – real or imaginary. Indeed, what psychiatry is doing… is attributing physical difference to one segment of the population, then interpreting that difference as a mark of inferiority, warranting correction. Such a construction, I would argue, is itself a close relative of racism and indeed of all oppressions which locate inferiority in the body of “the other” (p71).</div>
</blockquote>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Also of great interest to me, as a nurse, was Burstow’s account of the ways in which psychiatry has been part of the disempowering and invisibilising of women’s knowledge (p31). From witches (whose main crime was the mixing of potions, more than ironic in the light of the chapter on psychopharmacology) to women healers, counsellors, midwives and abortionists, psychiatry is implicated as a key part of the framing of women’s knowledge as madness, disqualifying women from working with ‘the mad’ and the subsequent bringing of women to heel by men as ‘psychiatric nurses’, the ‘serviceable underling’ (p159). Burstow also critiques the professionalisation of mental health in ways which may strike a chord with many nurses, firstly as a means of marginalising competitors, and it additionally</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: #f2f2f2; border: 0px; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-style: italic; font-weight: inherit; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 30px 10px 13px 18px; position: relative; quotes: "" ""; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
“…cuts the professional off from authentic knowing and relating. It at once distances the professional from the “othered” person, nullifies the humanity of both, and subverts understanding, turning “help” into mini tasks, in which one can have “competencies” (p164).</div>
</blockquote>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
However, it was in reading Burstow’s analysis of her interviews with psychiatrists that I felt most convicted as a nurse. That psychiatrists today are found with the same self-serving stories of being on the cusp of a new scientific and humanitarian age as they have repeated for the last two centuries is seen as comical (were it not for the power wielded by these credulous hopefuls) (p152). However, at that moment I saw the nursing story, <i>working to change the system from within</i>, a story that I have allowed myself to be recruited into, and I confess I still do not know what to do with that realisation. Burstow concludes that often well-meaning people are perpetuating the stories they need to hide their violence, and that their doing so amounts to “bad faith” (164). Not much middle ground is left.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Burstow’s examination of the DSM (referred to in her Institutional Ethnography as a ‘boss text’) is a particularly memorable chapter (p73 – 100), and while I have read arguments about validity and reliability many times, there did seem to be something incisive here in that Burstow argues that the purpose of the DSM is to couch reliability <i>as</i> validity (giving an analogy about identifying Martians!) (p78). Additionally, the chapter which concerns research and ‘evidence’ is essential reading, frightening though it is. While Burstow’s position appears extreme, Peter Gøtzsche of the Cochrane Collaboration has been producing similar analyses.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<b>Are there limitations?</b></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
This book might be said to share (in parts) a problem with some of Robert Whitaker’s writing. Both writers refuse the simplistic manner in which psychiatry may paint experiences as secondary to biology, a simple arrow of causation from brain to person, and in doing so they stand on very established ground. However, when describing the damage caused by psychiatric drugs, they seem much happier to then re-explain experience as secondary to this damage, without the non-reductionist understandings for which they convincingly argued minutes before. That said, the discussion of the damage caused by psychiatric drugs makes for alarming reading, and, although I am no neuroscientist, does tally very well with experiences I have witnessed first hand (and with the work of Joanna Moncrieff, for example).</div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<b>Trouble</b></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Realisations I do not know what to do with, an approach which views psychiatry as part of state power and the common human practice of ‘othering’, dramatically argued chapters about the illegitimacy and corruption of psychiatric treatments and their deliberately damaging effects: one can see that to read this book is to be caught in a meta-narrative of urgent and global consequences, of moral polarisation and imperative. It is a book written in such a way as to produce two possible outcomes – to create revolution or to be ignored. Therein lies its great difficulty, and depending on what you feel about psychiatry – perhaps what you already feel before you pick the book up – you will likely either see the two options as a problem which is located in Burstow’s head (leading to an dismissal of the text, which is uncomfortable given her credentials and the highly referenced and logically-argued nature of much of it), or a problem located in psychiatry and society (leading to the sense of great unrest and urgency she would endorse). As such, one could argue that Burstow has very faithfully presented the world (and critical mental health discourse) as it is.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
This problem is crystallised in the final chapter, entitled <i>Dusting Ourselves Off and Starting Anew</i>. If one views the problem of psychiatry as being part of a grand narrative about power, if the problem is on a global scale, then the solutions one has to propose must be too. The result is an enormously idealistic closing chapter, and, just as before, depending on your point of view you may see it as essential, brave and perhaps even prophetic, or else naive, opinionated and utopian. You may feel that in widening the discussion to war, gender inequality and the environment Burstow is going ‘off-topic’, or else you may feel that she is finally getting the the heart of the matter. With subheadings such as <i>Daring to Dream</i> and <i>A Better World, </i>I would imagine that Burstow would be aware of this, saying that it is a matter for professional to “decide whose side they are on” (262). There are some sections on trauma I will certainly return to. <i>My own feeling is that your point of view is likely to be shaped by your experience of power: if you have it, it is generally hard to see what all the fuss is about</i>. It would be wrong to conclude that this book is somehow all just a matter of strong opinion to either like or dislike. The mainstream and more accepted face of mental health services is obviously no less caught in a narrative: one which raises certain ideas to high prominence while sweeping huge problems (bad science, corruption, discrimination, harm, history) under the carpet. Those who reject the central arguments of this book will probably find it very difficult to explain why. And that suggests that it is crucial reading.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Original available at: http://criticalmhnursing.org/2015/07/</div>
</div>
</article>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1855155468838354912.post-30095467421875088442015-10-28T11:35:00.000-07:002015-10-28T11:35:33.555-07:00Review from Don Weitz in Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol 17, No 1<blockquote style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px;" type="cite">
<div style="border-bottom-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 2px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<h2>
<b>Psychiatry and the Business of Madness: An Ethical and Epistemological Accounting. Bonnie Burstow. London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015, 316 pp., $40.00 (paperback) $95.00 (hardcover)</b>.</h2>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif;" type="cite">
<div style="border-bottom-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 2px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px;">
This book is arguably the most comprehensive and brilliant critique of psychiatry that I've ever read; it's a devastating expose of psychiatry's discredited medical model and institutional psychiatry, "a regime of ruling." Bonnie Burstow's book is absolutely awesome in its numerous, thoroughly researched facts and original insights and scholarship frequently voiced with passion. Burstow uses the research analytic tool of institutional ethnography-"ruling happens through texts, particularly through the activation of texts" (p. 18). With this powerful intellectual probe, she deconstructs "boss texts" and takes us on an incredible journey into psychiatry, its alarming methods of social control, its intrusive brain-damaging drugs and electroshock. Burstow ends this awesome work in the spirit of hope and humanity she calls "Eutopia," a vision of a better world of compassion, empathy, mutual caring, respect for freedom and human rights. </div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif;" type="cite">
<div style="border-bottom-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 2px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px;">
She begins with a short and concise history of psychiatry featuring mad doctors and "alienists" (an apt word) during the 18th century, including Philippe Pinel who unchained poor people with mental illness in a Paris asylum but instituted a reign of terror of close surveillance and control. In the 19th century, there's Benjamin Rush, the notorious "father of American psychiatry" whose face appears on the American Psychiatric Association's logo; he invented the traumatic "tranquilizer chair" and advocated fear as therapeutic; he also labeled black slaves with the disease of "drapetomania," running away to be free; he also committed his son to an insane asylum. The gentler "moral treatment/moral management" of country retreats in the late 18th and early 19th centuries soon died; by the late 19th and early 20th century, it was replaced with eugenics/genetics-based, physically intrusive biological psychiatry, which unfortunately dominates today. This is a small but telling fragment of psychiatry's dark history of social control, medical fraud, coercion, and violence.<br />
Burstow asserts that two fundamental principles underlie psychiatry and the book: parens patriae and police powers. Parens patriae (literally "father of the country") refers to power of the state to control, imprison, and forcibly treat citizens; police powers are mainly expressed as coercion, arrest, and use of force. Psychiatry, Burstow asserts, is essentially a regime of ruling; however, given psychiatry's hegemonic social control, the terms psychiatric dictatorship and psychiatric police state seem more appropriate.</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif;" type="cite">
<div style="border-bottom-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 2px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px;">
In Chapter 4 ("Probing the Boss Text: DSM-What? Whither? How? Which?"), Burstow brilliantly analyzes the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), psychiatry's bible of fraudulent diseases. Unlike medical diagnoses, the approximately 350 diagnostic labels in DSM-5 (the current edition) are not only subjective and unscientific but also frequently lead to serious life-changing consequences such as loss of freedom (involuntary commitment), psychiatric drugging, and/or electroshock (electroconvulsive therapy [ECT]). DSM labels, Burstow asserts, serve no medical or scientific purpose, instead they routinely marginalize and stigmatize. Burstow succinctly summarizes major problems of the DSM, "subjectivity . . . masquerading as objectivity . . . nothing less than the essence of who the person is . . . constitutes a disorder" (pp. 94-95). She calls this activating text a "patient-processing system," denounces it as having absolutely no scientific validity or reliability; like the late psychiatrist Thomas Szasz and other dissident health professionals, Burstow correctly states there is "no mental illness" because there is no biological or medical evidence of cellular disease in anybody labeled mentally ill. With surgical precision, she exposes the fraudulent nature of DSM diagnoses while examining constructs such as "personality disorder," "oppositional defiant disorder," "schizophrenia," and "attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)," all allegedly types of "brain disease" caused by the discredited "chemical imbalance" theory. What's going on here is irrationally medicalizing nonconformist behavior, in fact virtually any intense emotional state-for example, sadness or grief labeled "depression," joy labeled "hypomania," and most everyday problems as "mental disorders." The DSM is the modern equivalent of the Inquisition's Malleus Maleficarum, a medieval boss text of written instructions ("criteria" or "symptoms") designed to identify and demonize heretics and witches-today's "mental patients." In short, "human existence itself [is] . . . theorized as . . . a disorder" (pp. 89-90); "problems are located exclusively within the individual . . . something that conflicts with Aboriginal experience, not to mention that of most of the world" (p. 92). This is not medical diagnosis or "medical science," it's psychiatry-and-state-sponsored quackery.<br />
Another clear and important message is "psychiatry is an agent of the state." In this connection, Burstow examines relevant sections of Ontario's Mental Health Act (MHA; Chapter 5, "The Beast/Inside the Belly of the Beast: Pinioned by Paper"). Like virtually all mental health laws and regulations, the MHA legitimizes preventive detention as involuntary committal (incarcerating citizens without charge and public hearing or trial); it also falsely assumes that psychiatrists can predict dangerousness. As an example, Burstow cites these sweeping and vague criteria for involuntary committal:</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif;" type="cite">
<div style="border-bottom-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 2px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px;">
The patient is suffering from mental disorder of a nature or quality that likely will result in:<br />
(i) Serious bodily harm to the patient,<br />
(ii) Serious bodily harm to another person, or<br />
(iii) Serious physical impairment of the patient unless the patient remains in the custody of a psychiatric facility. (p. 107)</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif;" type="cite">
<div style="border-bottom-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 2px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px;">
The term mental disorder is not specifically defined here or anywhere else in the act. Also, the term likely will result is a guesstimate, not medical evidence or scientific fact, because psychiatrists admit they cannot predict dangerousness; the term serious physical impairment is obviously, if not deliberately, vague and open to multiple interpretations. As ruling words, these criteria make it very easy for psychiatrists to label and lock up and chemically restrain (forcibly drug) innocent citizens for at least 72 hours under the "Observation and Assessment" provision in Form 1. The incarceration and forced drugging of Irit Shimrat, a close friend, courageous survivor, and author, is very relevant; her story is a frightening object lesson in psychiatric-and-state-<wbr></wbr>sponsored coercion and violence (pp. 123-124). Compounding this injustice, during the initial "period of observation and assessment," the person cannot appeal or launch any legal action. Even more alarming, Burstow points out that people can also be involuntarily committed (lose their freedom) if they refuse to "take their meds," or if they've "previously received treatment or from a mental disorder . . . and likely to suffer substantial mental or physical deterioration or serious physical impairment" (p. 109). Again, this major term is not defined or explained. Equally alarming, the MHA greatly expands police powers such as authorizing police officers in Ontario the power to diagnose mental disorder, predict dangerousness, arrest, and forcibly transport citizens to psychiatric facilities for psychiatric examination mainly based on subjective belief:</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif;" type="cite">
<div style="border-bottom-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 2px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px;">
A police officer has reasonable and probable grounds to believe that a person is acting or has acted in a disorderly manner and has reasonable cause to believe that the person,<br />
(a) Has threatened or attempted or is threatening or attempting to cause bodily harm to himself or herself;<br />
(b) Has behaved or is behaving violently toward another person and has caused or is causing another person to fear bodily harm from him or her; or<br />
(c) Is showing a lack of competence to take care of himself or herself, and in addition the police officer that the person is apparently suffering from a mental disorder of a nature or quality that will likely result in,<br />
(d) Serious bodily harm to the person,<br />
(e) Serious bodily harm to another, or<br />
(f) Serious physical impairment of the person.</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif;" type="cite">
<div style="border-bottom-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 2px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px;">
Burstow comments, " . . . evidence that officials are permitted to use in making their assessments includes not simply what they directly observe but also what is relayed by others. The 'mentally ill person' becomes 'an easy target.' People can be committed against their will simply because they are not taking their meds." Many survivors stop or try to stop taking antidepressants and/or neuroleptics (antipsychotics) for good reason-they can't tolerate the incredible suffering and disability the drugs cause (p. 110).</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif;" type="cite">
<div style="border-bottom-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 2px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px;">
Once the person ends up in a psychiatric hospital or mental health center, he or she is subjected to more violence, what Burstow calls "cosmeticized violence . . . students are socialized to give and force damaging treatments on people". In the chapter "The Psychiatric Team," psychiatric and nursing staff violence inherent in physical restraints, forced drugging, and "seclusion" (solitary confinement), for example, is rationalized as self-defence from the perceived or imagined violence of patients "in need of control." In this environment ruled by a hierarchy of psychiatrists, psychologists, nurses, and social workers, violence serves a double purpose-control of patients and enforcement of unity among team members. In this controlled and controlling environment, whistleblowers are nonexistent; team solidarity trumps care, compassion, and empathy.<br />
"Marching to 'Pharmageddon': Polypharmacy Unmasked" (Chapter 7) is an important consciousness-raising object lesson on psychiatric drugs as a major method of social control. The brain-damaging effects of psychiatry's "safe and effective" neuroleptics (antipsychotics)-for example, blunting of emotions, apathy, indifference, cognitive impairment; so are akathisia, tardive dyskinesia, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and parkinsonism, all are clinical indications of brain damage sanitized as "side effects" of psychiatry's "safe and effective medication." Burstow draws heavily on the consciousnessraising critiques of dissident psychiatrist Peter Breggin, investigative journalist Robert Whitaker, and other independent researchers, as well as her own professional knowledge and experience. Although not a medical doctor, Burstow clearly and critically explains how these drugs, particularly the "atypical" neuroleptics such as Risperdal, Zyprexa, and Abilify that impact several parts of the brain; they seriously disrupt the neurotransmitter dopamine in the mesocortical and mesolimbic systems, invariably causing brain damage or chemical lobotomy. The antidepressants have similar if not more serious brain-damaging effects in addition to causing suicidal ideas, suicide attempts, mania, and sudden violence. The biological psychiatrists, Burstow asserts, falsely claim "chemical imbalance" or lack of dopamine in the brain as the major cause of schizophrenia, for example; psychiatrists, medical doctors, and researchers, largely funded by the drug companies (Big Pharma) continue ignoring the fact that psychiatric drugs cause this chemical imbalance and brain damage, including the tragic and disabling neurological disorders-an admission they're afraid to acknowledge. A person with a previous psychiatric history can be kept on psychiatric drugs virtually indefinitely, thanks to a community treatment order, another boss text that authorizes doctors, not just psychiatrists, to prescribe psychiatric drugs for years or indefinitely to patients after they're released to the community (see Tranquil Prisons by Erick Fabris). Under this draconian mental health law, refusal to "take their meds" can result in people being committed for longer periods. The transnational drug companies also come in for well-deserved criticism for their unscientific research and unethical marketing practices, including mislabeling and hiding many health-threatening effects of psychiatric drugs during clinical trials, major findings are often kept secret. Also, government regulators such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States and Health Canada are shown to be frequently incompetent and complicit in failing to fully warn and protect the public about high-risk drugs.</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif;" type="cite">
<div style="border-bottom-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 2px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px;">
Burstow is at her most critical in powerfully exposing and denouncing "Electroshock" (ECT), arguably psychiatry's most destructive procedure today, one that many shock survivors and activists have been protesting against for almost 40 years and want banned (Chapter 8). Contrary to popular belief following the film One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, ECT never stopped and never banned but has increased worldwide. Burstow accurately and concisely describes the ECT procedure involving sedative, muscle paralyzer ("muscle relaxant"), oxygen, and electricity; 1501 V are delivered from a shock machine to electrodes placed on one side (unilateral) or both sides (bilateral) of the brain. ECT always causes a grand mal seizure-dishonestly called therapeutic by shock promoters Richard Abrams, Max Fink, the American Psychiatric Association, and Canadian Psychiatric Association. Also, every ECT causes an immediate convulsion, coma, memory loss, and brain damage. Burstow bluntly and concisely comments, Iatrogenically created dysfunction, Diminished capacity. Lobotomy-like unawareness. Anosognosia-the cognitive impairment that involves inability recognize that one is impaired Compliance itself. Euphoria caused by brain damage . . . after four weeks, this brain-damaging treatment is no more effective than placebo . . . people . . . are being brain-damaged for nothing . . . The most pervasive themes . . . are: memory loss; cognitive impairment; loss of skills, prospects, ability to function, connections itself, with diminishment of the person emerging as an overarching theme. (pp. 215, 224)</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif;" type="cite">
<div style="border-bottom-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 2px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px;">
The American Psychiatric Association's promotional mantra that ECT is "safe and effective treatment" is directly challenged by several scientific studies that Burstow summarizes. For example, she succinctly explains the significance of Harold Sackeim's landmark comprehensive 2007 study in which he conclusively proves the brain-damaging and memory-destroying effects of electroshock-regardless of type or mode of ECT, placement of electrodes, age, and gender; as prime targets, women and the elderly suffer the greatest damage, reflecting sexist and ageist biases in ECT (pp. 212-213). Electroshock's many devastating and tragic effects come to life with excerpts of Burstow's interviews with several Canadian shock survivors and some of their personal testimony at the 2005 Enquiry into Psychiatry public hearings in Toronto. The statements by Connie, Wendy, and "C's" story are particularly memorable and riveting; they courageously speak truth to power (pp. 216-222).</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif;" type="cite">
<div style="border-bottom-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 2px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px;">
As organizational-systemic analysis, Burstow's graphic illustrations of the "The ECT Empire" (p. 204) and "Rule by ECT Scholar/Capitalists" (p. 208) are original, accurate, and chilling in their details. They clearly show the interconnections and conflicts of interest among shock promoters such as Richard Abrams, Max Fink, and Richard Weiner with the American Psychiatric Association's task force reports, close links to journals, textbooks, shock machine manufacturers (e.g., somatics owned by proshock psychiatrist Richard Abrams), hospitals, and government regulators such as the FDA and Health Canada. Near the end of this chapter, these conclusions are worth quoting and remembering: "People's lives are essentially obliterated-erased" (p. 217).<br />
The authorities most influential in framing psychiatry's position on ECT are themselves the arch capitalists who receive the primary benefit . . . the treatment is buoyed up by shoddy research and research flagrantly misrepresented . . . after four weeks, this brain-damaging treatment is no more effective than placebo . . . people . . . are being brain-damaged for nothing . . . The most pervasive themes . . . are: memory loss; cognitive impairment; loss of skills, prospects, ability to function, connection itself, with diminishment of the person emerging as an overarching theme. More psychological themes include: trauma, torture, and punishment. Control is of the essence. ECT . . . should not be paid for by our ministries of health, nor should it be offered by medical practitioners . . . [ECT] should be phased out. (p. 224)</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif;" type="cite">
<div style="border-bottom-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 2px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px;">
Although no province, state, or country has officially banned ECT, there is worldwide resistance: The first International Day of Protest Against Electroshock, organized by three shock survivors, was held on May 16, 2015, in 28 cities in 6 or more countries including the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, New Zealand, Scotland, Ireland, Uruguay, and Chile.</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif;" type="cite">
<div style="border-bottom-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 2px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px;">
The antishock movement is obviously a major priority action in the antipsychiatry movement, which, hopefully, will spread globally as Burstow and other activists including myself advocate. If you're a psychiatric survivor, activist, supporter, or ally, Burstow urges you to ask yourself these three key questions:</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif;" type="cite">
<div style="border-bottom-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 2px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px;">
1. If successful, will the actions or campaigns that we are contemplating move us closer to the long-range goal of psychiatry abolition?<br />
2. Are they likely to avoid improving or giving added legitimacy to the current system?<br />
3. Do they avoid "widening" psychiatry's net? (p. 258)</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif;" type="cite">
<div style="border-bottom-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 2px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px;">
Thanks to Bonnie Burstow, this book moves us closer to the day when there will be no medical model of "mental illness," no electroshock, no psychiatry, but Eutopia-a world based on mutual caring, emotional and social support, empathy, respect for our human rights, and humanity.<br />
<div>
<strong></strong></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<b>Don Weitz</b><br />
Toronto, OntarioUnknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1855155468838354912.post-3973446970912386622015-09-13T15:09:00.000-07:002015-09-13T15:09:42.043-07:00Psychiatry and the Business of Madness Book Review<div style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;">
<strong><span name="auto_lnk_name 41" style="font-size: 16px;">Psychiatry and the Business of Madness: A Book Review</span></strong></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;">
<span name="auto_lnk_name 42" style="font-size: 12px;"><span name="auto_lnk_name 43" style="font-size: 12px;"></span>by Simon Adams, RN, PhD</span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;">
Author: Bonnie Burstow<br />Publisher: Palgrave MacMillan</div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;">
ISBN: 978-1-137-50384-8 (Paperback $40)<br />ISBN: 978-1-137-50383-1 (Hardcover $95)</div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;">
I picked up this book with the intent to see how the mental health professional is handled, particularly, how nursing is theorized. As an academic nurse and professional participant in the research, I have a particular engagement with this book. Having long grappled with the effects of psychoactive drugs on the human brain, reading Burstow’s psychopharmacology analysis concretized this for me. While she is not a medical doctor, her analysis made accessible the chemistry of the drugs and its impact on the body. The book also gave me a solid look into where nursing stands in relation to the larger establishment of psychiatry. As an institutional ethnographer, I am delighted with this use of institutional ethnography. What is particularly special about this book is its very thorough analysis of the institution.<span> </span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;">
In her rather troubling institutional analysis, Burstow unveils the ethically dubious relations of power and the discourses that establish and maintain modern day psychiatry. She begins with a disturbing, visceral account in the everyday world of the psychiatrized and methodically proceeds to trace the various intricate political and historical workings of the regime. Leaving no stone unturned, the author sketches distant and recent history, dissects discourses, examines texts, interrogates practices, maps out vested interests, relationships, politics, and processes. Advancing a sobering (and at times, bloodcurdling) analysis, she implicates history and brings attention to the disconcerting philosophical, political, and moral underpinnings of the psychiatric regime. Burstow carries out a carefully-investigated institutional ethnography within which she weaves a dynamic critical discourse analysis. She does this with impeccable logic.</div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;">
The book, an original contribution to the critical and abolitionist literature, is unique in the following ways: It gives an inside look at the workings of the Ontario Consent and Capacity Board, advances an analysis of how psychiatry comes together as a multi-institutional system, and offers a real and everyday vision for a better world.</div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;">
The mental health industry is exposed as a system that is fitted together by a number of sub-institutions: psychopharmacology, the research industry, the State, and the hospital, to name a few. As its textual locus of control, psychiatry, and by extension, the mental health team draws on the DSM. On the DSM, Burstow writes that it is “conceptually, phenomenologically, and otherwise flawed,” its categories have “no relationship to validity,” its diagnoses have no biological basis, and its criteria sets “are blatantly sexist, racist, classist, and transphobic.” This, she roots in an analysis of the text – the “boss text” – as a presiding “ruling” mechanism whose textual logic eclipses and overrides that of the humanistic and the compassionate. A formidable and cogent ethnography!</div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;">
The author establishes that “psychiatry’s basic tenets are insupportable, that no biological basis has been established for any mental illness, that the claims of chemical imbalance lack foundation, the profession has no ability to predict dangerousness.” She probes the profession and its practices, paving the way for a compelling analysis of psychiatric drugs, advancing that they themselves lead to chemical imbalances and irreversible brain damage. To that respect, she writes: “no medical credibility can be attached to a substance that is not medical, that addresses nothing medical, that gives rise to medical disorders, and whose modus operandi is dysfunction and damage.”</div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;">
In chapter five, what is arguably her most powerful chapter – and they are all indeed powerful – Burstow demonstrates how the institution comes together, both a unique and a compelling contribution. Unique because no other scholar in the area has carried out an investigation on this level, and compelling because of the utter palpability of the evidence she presents to secure this institutional picture. The author demonstrates the functioning of psychiatry as an “extensive network of laws, forms, organizations, agents, procedures, all of a transcarceral bent, all of it circular, all of it facilitating psychiatric rule.” She takes us through the never-before-investigated Ontario Consent and Capacity Board hearings, exposing their institutional and discursive smokescreens. She transplants the reader alongside her while observing psychiatry’s “processing” of the patient, noting that “aspects of the system purportedly designed to protect ‘patients’ from ‘psychiatric excesses’ – the Consent and Capacity board, for example – are predicated on and overwhelmingly reinforce psychiatry.”</div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;">
It is in Burstow’s micro and macro investigative style that the reader eventually finds herself unable to hold on to psychiatry as a helping profession or as a legitimate medical entity altogether. Without the reader needing to look further, psychiatry is left to crumble in the face of Burstow’s commanding historical archeology, her institutional and discourse analyses, and her methodical step-by-step look at the system from within and from without.</div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;">
With her final chapter, which is notably the most original contribution to the literature, Burstow challenges the boundaries of our thinking. She offers a beginning to an alternate, psychiatry-free world, one rooted in community and individual autonomy. And still, in this “eutopia,” she does not ignore the possibility of violence and interpersonal conflict, only here, they are convincingly theorized as a rare occurrence. She offers what no other scholar in this area has: Real and everyday interpersonal and relational case scenarios, complete with possibilities of what to do and how to proceed.</div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;">
While holding on to the complexities, the author writes with exceptional clarity. The book, though a multi-decade scholarly investigation that dialogues with professionals and other scholars, is more importantly an accessible, informative, and sensitive piece of work that speaks to the everyday person. Burstow addresses doctors, nurses, social workers, psychologists, researchers, legislators, survivors, parents, friends, and community members. She navigates such complex and multilayered discussions beautifully.</div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;">
This book is long-coming. It creates a rift in our thinking. It begins a commanding counter-narrative to the psychiatric status quo. A daring piece of work that is both unsettling and necessary and an enriching and an essential possibility to social work, nursing, psychology, and medical curricula. Psychiatry and the Business of Madness marks a long-awaited radical trajectory change in the direction in which the world ought to go.</div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;">
In ending, do yourself a favour and pick up this remarkable book. If you are like me, besides that you will learn a great deal, like with so many other of the classic in the field – and yes, I am predicting that it will quickly become a classic – you will not be able to put it down.<span> </span></div>
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"></span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; margin: 0in 0in 8pt;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; margin: 0in 0in 8pt;">
See more at: <a href="http://trk.cp20.com/Tracking/t.c?8r1vd-tqhq7-wtlnd13&_v=2" name="14fc37077a40be97_wwwempathictherapyorg" style="background-color: #b7edff; color: #1155cc; font-size: 11px; text-align: -webkit-center;" target="_blank">EmpathicTherapy.org</a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1855155468838354912.post-17063062266643443202015-08-01T07:46:00.003-07:002015-08-01T07:46:25.156-07:00Interview with Dr. Burstow on Rabble.ca<h1 class="title" style="background-color: white; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 18pt; list-style: none; margin: 0px auto; padding: 0px;">
Probing psychiatry and the business of madness</h1>
<h2 class="dek" style="background-color: white; color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; font-style: italic; list-style: none; margin: 0px 0px 10px; padding: 0px;">
What kind of society do we need to create so that people will thrive rather than feel alienated?</h2>
<div class="story-author" style="background-color: white; color: #3f3f3f; display: inline; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 7pt; text-transform: uppercase;">
BY <div class="tags-14" style="display: inline; font-size: 8pt;">
<span class="only-vocabulary-14" style="font-size: 8pt;"><span class="term-35675" style="font-size: 8pt;"><a href="http://rabble.ca/category/bios/lauren-spring" style="color: black; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">LAUREN SPRING</a></span></span></div>
</div>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10.6666669845581px;"> | </span><span class="date-display-single" style="background-color: white; color: #3f3f3f; display: inline; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 7pt; text-transform: uppercase;">JULY 30, 2015</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10.6666669845581px;"></span><br />
<div class="rabble-nodelinks rabble-nodelinks-top" style="background: none 0px 0px repeat scroll rgb(237, 237, 237); clear: both; color: #3f3f3f; float: left; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10.6666669845581px; margin: 10px 0px 18px; padding: 5px 10px; width: 553px;">
<ul style="font-size: 8pt; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<li style="float: left; font-size: 8pt; padding-right: 16px;"><div class="rabble-nodelinks-print" style="font-size: 8pt;">
<a href="http://rabble.ca/print/books/reviews/2015/07/probing-psychiatry-and-business-madness" style="background: url(http://rabble.ca/sites/rabble.ca/themes/dreamyrabble/images/nodelinks/printsmall.png) 0% 4px no-repeat scroll transparent; color: black; float: left; font-size: 7pt; padding: 4px 0px 4px 18px; text-decoration: none;">Print</a></div>
</li>
<li style="float: left; font-size: 8pt; padding-right: 16px;"><div class="rabble-nodelinks-editor" style="font-size: 8pt;">
<a href="http://rabble.ca/contact/editor/[letter%20to%20editor%20for%20rabble.ca-node-119043]" style="background: url(http://rabble.ca/sites/rabble.ca/themes/dreamyrabble/images/nodelinks/writesmall.png) 0% 5px no-repeat scroll transparent; color: black; float: left; font-size: 7pt; padding: 4px 0px 4px 18px; text-decoration: none;">Write to editor</a></div>
</li>
<li style="float: left; font-size: 8pt; padding-right: 16px;"><div class="rabble-nodelinks-support" style="font-size: 8pt;">
<a href="http://rabble.ca/supportrabble" style="background: url(http://rabble.ca/sites/rabble.ca/themes/dreamyrabble/images/nodelinks/supportsmall.png) 0% 4px no-repeat scroll transparent; color: black; float: left; font-size: 7pt; padding: 4px 0px 4px 18px; text-decoration: none;">Support rabble</a></div>
</li>
<li style="float: left; font-size: 8pt; padding-right: 16px;"><div class="rabble-nodelinks-editor" style="font-size: 8pt;">
<a href="http://rabble.ca/contact/corrections/[correction%20for%20article%20rabble.ca-node-119043]" style="background: url(http://rabble.ca/sites/rabble.ca/themes/dreamyrabble/images/nodelinks/writesmall.png) 0% 5px no-repeat scroll transparent; color: black; float: left; font-size: 7pt; padding: 4px 0px 4px 18px; text-decoration: none;">Corrections</a></div>
</li>
<li class="addthis" style="float: right; font-size: 8pt; padding: 0px;"><div class="rabble-nodelinks-addthis" style="font-size: 8pt;">
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " style="font-size: 8pt; margin: 4px 0px;">
<a class="addthis_button_facebook at300b" href="http://rabble.ca/books/reviews/2015/07/probing-psychiatry-and-business-madness?utm_content=buffer72dc0&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer#" style="color: black; cursor: pointer; float: left; font-size: 7pt; padding: 0px 2px; text-decoration: none; width: auto;" title="Facebook"><span class="at4-icon aticon-facebook" style="background: url(data:image/svg+xml; cursor: pointer; display: block; float: left; font-size: 8pt; height: 16px; line-height: 16px; margin: 0px; overflow: hidden; text-indent: -9999em; width: 16px;"><span class="at_a11y" style="font-size: 8pt; height: 1px !important; overflow: hidden !important; position: absolute !important; top: auto !important; width: 1px !important;">Share on facebook</span></span></a><a class="addthis_button_twitter at300b" href="http://rabble.ca/books/reviews/2015/07/probing-psychiatry-and-business-madness?utm_content=buffer72dc0&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer#" style="color: black; cursor: pointer; float: left; font-size: 7pt; padding: 0px 2px; text-decoration: none; width: auto;" title="Tweet"><span class="at4-icon aticon-twitter" style="background: url(data:image/svg+xml; cursor: pointer; display: block; float: left; font-size: 8pt; height: 16px; line-height: 16px; margin: 0px; overflow: hidden; text-indent: -9999em; width: 16px;"><span class="at_a11y" style="font-size: 8pt; height: 1px !important; overflow: hidden !important; position: absolute !important; top: auto !important; width: 1px !important;">Share on twitter</span></span></a><a class="addthis_button_email at300b" href="http://rabble.ca/books/reviews/2015/07/probing-psychiatry-and-business-madness?utm_content=buffer72dc0&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer#" style="color: black; cursor: pointer; float: left; font-size: 7pt; padding: 0px 2px; text-decoration: none; width: auto;" target="_blank" title="Email"><span class="at4-icon aticon-email" style="background: url(data:image/svg+xml; cursor: pointer; display: block; float: left; font-size: 8pt; height: 16px; line-height: 16px; margin: 0px; overflow: hidden; text-indent: -9999em; width: 16px;"><span class="at_a11y" style="font-size: 8pt; height: 1px !important; overflow: hidden !important; position: absolute !important; top: auto !important; width: 1px !important;">Share on email</span></span></a><a class="addthis_button_compact at300m" href="http://rabble.ca/books/reviews/2015/07/probing-psychiatry-and-business-madness?utm_content=buffer72dc0&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer#" style="color: black; cursor: pointer; float: left; font-size: 7pt; padding: 0px 2px; text-decoration: none; width: auto;"><span class="at4-icon aticon-compact" style="background: url(data:image/svg+xml; cursor: pointer; display: block; float: left; font-size: 8pt; height: 16px; line-height: 16px; margin: 0px; overflow: hidden; text-indent: -9999em; width: 16px;"><span class="at_a11y" style="font-size: 8pt; height: 1px !important; overflow: hidden !important; position: absolute !important; top: auto !important; width: 1px !important;">More Sharing Services</span></span></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_bubble_style" href="http://rabble.ca/books/reviews/2015/07/probing-psychiatry-and-business-madness?utm_content=buffer72dc0&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer#" style="background-image: url(data:image/gif; background-position: 0px -64px; background-repeat: no-repeat; border: 0px; box-sizing: content-box; color: black; cursor: pointer; display: inline-block; float: left; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: 700; height: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 0px -2px; outline: none; padding: 0px 0px 0px 4px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none !important; width: 32px !important;"></a><a class="addthis_button_expanded" href="http://rabble.ca/books/reviews/2015/07/probing-psychiatry-and-business-madness?utm_content=buffer72dc0&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer#" style="background: 0px 0px; border: 0px; color: #333333; display: block; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif !important; font-size: 11px; font-weight: 700; height: 16px; line-height: 16px; margin-bottom: 3px; padding: 0px 3px 4px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; width: 34px;" target="_blank" title="View more services">5</a><div class="atclear" style="clear: both; font-size: 8pt;">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="content" style="background-color: white; clear: left; margin: 0.5em 0px;">
<div class="story-content">
<div class="field field-type-image field-field-image-for-node" style="color: #3f3f3f; float: left; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 8pt; line-height: 1.4em;">
<div class="field-items" style="font-size: 8pt;">
<div class="field-item" style="font-size: 8pt;">
<a class="imagefield imagefield-lightbox2 imagefield-lightbox2-350px-width-scale-PREVIEW imagefield-field_image_for_node imagecache imagecache-field_image_for_node imagecache-350px-width-scale-PREVIEW imagecache-field_image_for_node-350px-width-scale-PREVIEW lightbox-processed" href="http://rabble.ca/sites/rabble/files/node-images/screen_shot_2015-07-07_at_4.05.55_pm.png" rel="lightbox[field_image_for_node][Probing psychiatry and the business of madness]" style="color: black; font-size: 0pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><img alt="Probing psychiatry and the business of madness" height="536" src="http://rabble.ca/sites/rabble/files/imagecache/350px-width-scale-PREVIEW/node-images/screen_shot_2015-07-07_at_4.05.55_pm.png" style="border: 1px solid rgb(154, 154, 154); float: left; font-size: 0pt; margin: 0px 15px 10px 0px; padding: 2px;" title="" width="350" /></a></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="book-info" style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 8pt; line-height: 1.4em; margin: 0px 0px 10px; padding: 17px 0px 0px;">
<h2 class="book-title" style="font-size: 8pt; font-style: italic; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
Psychiatry and the Business of Madness: An Ethical and Epistemological Accounting</h2>
<div class="book-author" style="display: inline; font-size: 8pt;">
by Bonnie Burstow</div>
<div class="book-publisher" style="display: inline; font-size: 8pt;">
(Palgrave Macmillan, </div>
<div class="book-date" style="display: inline; font-size: 8pt;">
<span class="date-display-single" style="display: inline; font-size: 7pt; text-transform: uppercase;">2015</span>; </div>
<div class="book-price" style="display: inline; font-size: 8pt;">
$40.00)</div>
</div>
<div class="body" style="clear: right;">
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<em style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;"><a href="https://secure.rabble.ca/donate/" style="color: black; font-size: 9pt; font-weight: bold; line-height: 15pt; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Chip in</a> to keep stories like these coming.</em></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<a href="https://secure.rabble.ca/donate/" style="color: black; font-size: 9pt; font-weight: bold; line-height: 15pt; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"><img height="30" src="http://rabble.ca/sites/rabble/files/node-images/donategreen.png" style="border: 0px; font-size: 0pt;" width="120" /></a></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<em style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;">A revolutionary new book on psychiatry, </em><a href="http://www.palgrave.com/page/detail/psychiatry-and-the-business-of-madness-bonnie-burstow/?isb=9781137503831" rel="nofollow" style="color: black; font-size: 9pt; font-weight: bold; line-height: 15pt; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Psychiatry and the Business of Madness: An Ethical And Epistemological Accounting</a> <em style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;">by Dr. Bonnie Burstow, was recently released by Palgrave Macmillan and has already drawn major conclusions and had huge societal implications.</em></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<em style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;">The book deconstructs psychiatric discourse and practice and challenges the reader with such conclusions as: There is no credible basis for a single "mental disorder" and the drugs prescribed do not correct but create chemical imbalances.</em></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<em style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;">Burstow challenges the reader to examine how society addresses certain problems and perhaps if we need to abandon psychiatry and rebuild lives together.</em></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<em style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;">Lauren Spring, art-based trauma specialist and a doctoral student, sat down with the Burstow to discuss her latest book and the conclusions and implications it has achieved.</em></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<em style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;">This is an abbreviated version of the interview.</em></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<strong style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;">Why do you feel this book is important for people to read now?</strong></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
To be clear, the problems illuminated didn't just emerge. While I realize that this is contrary to people's image of psychiatry as a necessary service, as the book demonstrates, psychiatry can be roughly characterized as a regime of disinformation, intrusion, damage, and control -- in other words, there is a problem here; and the problem has been serious a long time. People are being treated as if their ways of being in the world, admittedly often troubled ways, are medical disorders, when in point of fact, they are not.</div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
In the process, people are being brain-damaged and their lives substantially reduced. That said, what makes this particularly urgent is that psychiatry is a growth industry and so even more people are being damaged and diminished.</div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<br /></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<strong style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;">Bearing that in mind, who do you think should read this book? Who did you write it for?</strong></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
I wrote it for psychiatric survivors, for their families, for professionals, for scholars. But first and foremost, I wrote it for members of the general public. This is our society: We have given immense authority over people deemed mad to this industry which is, in essence, declaring ever more and more people crazy, which is not solving but both creating and exacerbating people's problems in living. It's time for us to rethink and rescind that authority.</div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<br /></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<strong style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;">One of chapters that stuck with me most was that one about the health-care team, and this idea you bring up of professionalization. What I thought was very interesting was that you weren't demonizing the individual practitioners, but placing them in the context of this larger system. Could you speak to that?</strong></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
The purpose of mental health professionalization is to serve the professionals; the purpose of the related industries to serve the industry -- and individual practitioners-in-the-making are partially unwittingly sucked into this.</div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
To put this another way, people go into these different disciplines, in many cases, out of a heartfelt desire to help. And slowly but surely, they get socialized into modes of thinking that have them acting in these destructive ways.</div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
In concert with this, just as professionals control the so-called mentally ill, they are themselves controlled. In this regard, I interviewed a large number of people from different disciplines that work in "psychiatric institutions," members of "the mental health team," as it's called. And what I discovered is that there's a party line, and people are more or less forced to toe that line. A nurse, for example, could not just ask other team members, "Why are we immediately turning to electroshock with this patient?" Indeed, one of the nurses interviewed in my research says, she was called on the carpet just for asking that question.</div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<br /></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<strong style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;">You give a very comprehensive history of the origins of psychiatry. And of course, historically, women were often psychiatrized for behaving in certain ways…or just existing in the world, right?</strong></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
Women were psychiatrized either for stereotypically being women, or for veering too far from the stereotypes. Either one. As for what's happening now, today, there is no question that there are stereotypical women's diseases -- e.g., "borderline personality disorder" -- and there is no question that women are way more likely to end up being given a "disorder" than a man, also to be given more serious ones. That's true, I would add, of oppressed people in general. Of racialized people, poor people, trans people, etcetera. That noted, there is also a degree to which psychiatry is nonetheless an equal opportunity oppressor, in the sense that it is quite happy to psychiatrize anyone. With psychiatry's interest in continual expansion, that's the new reality that we are facing -- everybody is in jeopardy.</div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<br /></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<strong style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;">What role do you see the pharmaceutical industry playing in modern day psychiatry?</strong></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
The pharmaceutical industry, for all intents and purposes, is modern day psychiatry -- all else are "add-ons." What's important to understand here is that in 1970s psychiatry found itself in danger of disappearing for non-medical professionals were frankly better at helping. Its solution was to hyper-medicalize -- that is, to create more and more the false appearance that what it was doing was medical.</div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
In this drive to medicalize, the one thing that doctors are most noted for -- giving drugs -- became focal, for emphasizing it would really make their work look medical. Enter the foundationless claim of chemical imbalances and the drug push. Now we have an unholy alliance between psychiatry and the pharmaceutical companies, whose ultimate interest of course, is profit.</div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<br /></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<strong style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;">You refer in the book to the DSM [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders] as a "boss text." Could you elaborate?</strong></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
As a central text, it sets practitioners up to look at distressed and/or distressing people in certain ways. So, if they go into a psychiatric interview, they're going to be honing on questions that follow the logic of the DSM, or to use their vocabulary, the "symptoms" for any given "disease" they're considering.</div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
In the process it rips people out of their lives. And so now there's no explanation for the things people do, no way to see their words or actions as meaningful because the context has been removed.</div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
In essence, the DSM decontextualizes people's problems, then re-contextualizes them in terms of an invented concept called a "disorder."</div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
Let me give you an example. "Selective Mutism" is a diagnosis given to people who elect not to speak in certain situations. So, if I were a non-psychiatrist -- that is, your average thinking person who is trying to get an handle on what's going on with somebody -- I would try to figure out what situations they aren't speaking in, try to find out if there's some kind of common denominator, to ascertain whether there's something in their background or their current context that would help explain what they are doing. You know, as in: Is it safe to speak? Is this, for example, a person of colour going silent at times when racists might be present? Alternatively, is this a childhood sexual abuse survivor who is being triggered? Whatever it is, I would need to do that. But this is not what the DSM, as it were, prompts. In the DSM, "Selective Mutism" is a discrete disease.</div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
So, according to psychiatry, what causes these "symptoms" of not speaking? Well, "Selective Mutism," does. Note the circularity. That's what all the "mental disorders" are like: No explanatory value whatever, just circularity -- and yet they have authority in law. And as such, they authorize what gets done to people.</div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<br /></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<strong style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;">One of the things so remarkable about this book is you're helping us understand through history. Why did you think it important to open the book with a history of psychiatry?</strong></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
If we do not know where something comes from, we do not know where we are. So I wanted readers to see: How did decisions really get made? What was really behind them? Once you get through the history chapters, you have a sense of the territory.</div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<br /></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<strong style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;">Absolutely. I learned a lot from reading those chapters. To skip to the end, your final chapter -- and it's beautifully written and really sparks the imagination -- is about a world without psychiatry. Could you discuss that?</strong></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
Questions that we need to grapple with and that are posed in this chapter are: What kind of society do we need to create so that people will thrive rather than feel alienated? How do we reconstitute society so that everyone helps everyone else and so that we deal with problems together rather than targeting individuals and having those targeted folk consigned to experts? In essence, how do we live together in kinder, more accepting, more participatory, and more egalitarian ways?</div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<br /></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<strong style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;">One final question: How do we stop seeing psychiatrists as heroes?</strong></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
By being honest about the invalidity and the harm being done; by looking at the diminishment of community that happens when we hand the power to govern ourselves over to experts; by once again daring to dream. If we start doing that, might we not then individually and collectively be able to bring ourselves to admit that the rise of psychiatry was a colossal misstep?</div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<br /></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<em style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;">For details about the research underlying this book, see <a href="http://bizomadness.blogspot.ca/" rel="nofollow" style="color: black; font-size: 9pt; font-weight: bold; line-height: 15pt; text-decoration: none;">http://bizomadness.blogspot.ca/</a></em></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<em style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;">Dr. Bonnie Burstow is a faculty member at Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, a philosopher, a social theorist, a feminist therapist, an author, and a long time anti-psychiatry theorist and activist. Her books include: </em>Psychiatry and the Business of Madness, Radical Feminist Therapy and The House on Lippincott<em style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;">, as well as two anthologies of which she is first editor: </em>Shrink-Resistant<em style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;"> and </em>Psychiatry Disrupted.</div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<em style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;"><br style="font-size: 8pt;" />Lauren Spring is a doctoral student at Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, where she is conducting extensive research into military trauma, specifically focused on the Canadian military. She is also an actor, a theatre director, a critic of psychiatry, and an art-informed researcher. </em></div>
<div style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt; list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<em style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;"><br /></em></div>
<div style="list-style: none; padding: 5px 0pt;">
<em style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 15pt;">(Original site: </em><span style="color: #3f3f3f; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12px; line-height: 20px;"><i>http://rabble.ca/books/reviews/2015/07/probing-psychiatry-and-business-madness?utm_content=buffer72dc0&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer)</i></span></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1855155468838354912.post-68019717857351840002015-08-01T07:44:00.001-07:002015-08-01T07:44:03.772-07:00Dr. Paula Caplan Review's Dr. Burstow's Book in Psychology Today<div class="blog__header page-header" style="border-bottom-color: rgb(214, 214, 214); border-bottom-style: double; border-bottom-width: 3px; float: left; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, 'DejaVu Sans', sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; margin-bottom: 21px; min-height: 60px; padding-bottom: 11px; position: relative; width: 639px;">
<h2 class="page__title" style="font-family: RalewayBold, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 28px; font-weight: normal; line-height: 28px; margin: 0px 0px 6px;">
New Book Tracks Myriad Ways Mental Health System Fails</h2>
<div class="blog-subtitle" style="float: left; line-height: 16.8px; margin: 0px; max-width: 540px;">
Burstow Shows Many Forces That Cause Harm and Their Human Costs</div>
<div class="blog__author-description subtext" style="clear: both; color: #999999; float: left; font-size: 12.96px; max-width: 540px;">
Post published by <a href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/experts/paula-j-caplan-phd" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; color: #999999; font-size: 12.96px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;">Paula J. Caplan Ph.D.</a> on Jul 13, 2015 in <a href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/science-isnt-golden" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; color: #999999; font-size: 12.96px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;">Science Isn't Golden</a></div>
<div class="pt-social-media" style="bottom: 0px; position: relative;">
<div class="item-list" style="position: absolute;">
<ul class="share-buttons" id="pt-social-media" style="clear: both; left: 0px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; position: fixed; top: 320px;">
<li class="first" id="facebook-share" style="background-color: #305692; height: 49px; list-style: none; margin: 0px 0px 3px; padding: 0px; position: relative; width: 49px;"><a class="facebook-share-button open-dialog ext" data-lang="en" href="https://facebook.com/dialog/share?app_id=220580041311284&display=popup&href=https%3A//www.psychologytoday.com/blog/science-isnt-golden/201507/new-book-tracks-myriad-ways-mental-health-system-fails&redirect_uri=https%3A//www.psychologytoday.com/blog/science-isnt-golden/201507/new-book-tracks-myriad-ways-mental-health-system-fails" style="background: transparent; color: #30529e; display: block; height: 49px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; width: 49px; word-wrap: break-word;" target="_blank" title="Share on Facebook"><span style="background-image: url(https://cdn.psychologytoday.com/sites/all/themes/psychologytoday/img/social/svg/social-sharing-facebook.svg), none; background-position: 0px 0px; background-repeat: no-repeat; background-size: 22px; direction: ltr; display: block; height: 22px; margin: 0px auto; overflow: hidden; position: relative; text-indent: -999em; top: 14px; width: 22px;">SHARE</span></a></li>
<li id="twitter-share" style="background-color: #28a6d3; height: 49px; list-style: none; margin: 0px 0px 3px; padding: 0px; position: relative; width: 49px;"><a class="twitter-share-button open-dialog ext" data-lang="en" href="https://twitter.com/share?text=New%20Book%20Tracks%20Myriad%20Ways%20Mental%20Health%20System%20Fails%20%7C%20Psychology%20Today&url=https%3A//www.psychologytoday.com/blog/science-isnt-golden/201507/new-book-tracks-myriad-ways-mental-health-system-fails&related=PsychToday" style="background: transparent; color: #30529e; display: block; height: 49px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; width: 49px; word-wrap: break-word;" target="_blank" title="Share on Twitter"><span style="background-image: url(https://cdn.psychologytoday.com/sites/all/themes/psychologytoday/img/social/svg/social-sharing-twitter.svg), none; background-position: 0px 0px; background-repeat: no-repeat; background-size: 22px; direction: ltr; display: block; height: 22px; margin: 0px auto; overflow: hidden; position: relative; text-indent: -999em; top: 14px; width: 22px;">TWEET</span></a></li>
<li id="google-plus-share" style="background-color: #d04332; height: 49px; list-style: none; margin: 0px 0px 3px; padding: 0px; position: relative; width: 49px;"><a class="google-plus-share-button open-dialog ext" data-lang="en" href="https://plus.google.com/share?url=https%3A//www.psychologytoday.com/blog/science-isnt-golden/201507/new-book-tracks-myriad-ways-mental-health-system-fails&hl=en-US" style="background: transparent; color: #30529e; display: block; height: 49px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; width: 49px; word-wrap: break-word;" target="_blank" title="Share on Google+"><span style="background-image: url(https://cdn.psychologytoday.com/sites/all/themes/psychologytoday/img/social/svg/social-sharing-google-plus.svg), none; background-position: 0px 0px; background-repeat: no-repeat; background-size: 22px; direction: ltr; display: block; height: 22px; margin: 0px auto; overflow: hidden; position: relative; text-indent: -999em; top: 14px; width: 22px;">SHARE</span></a></li>
<li class="last" id="email-share" style="background-color: #315692; height: 49px; list-style: none; margin: 0px 0px 3px; padding: 0px; position: relative; width: 49px;"><a class="email-share-button open-dialog" data-lang="en" href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/printmail/1077093?destination=blog/science-isnt-golden/201507/new-book-tracks-myriad-ways-mental-health-system-fails" style="background: transparent; color: #30529e; display: block; height: 49px; position: relative; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; width: 49px; word-wrap: break-word; z-index: 1;" title="Share via Email"><span style="background-repeat: no-repeat; background-size: 22px; direction: ltr; display: block; height: 22px; margin: 0px auto; overflow: hidden; position: relative; text-indent: -999em; top: 14px; width: 22px;">EMAIL</span></a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<div class="fb-like-button" style="float: right; position: relative; top: -3px; width: 85px;">
<div class=" fb_reset" id="fb-root" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: none; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border-spacing: 0px; border: 0px; cursor: auto; direction: ltr; font-family: 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; overflow: visible; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; visibility: visible; word-spacing: normal;">
<div style="height: 0px; overflow: hidden; position: absolute; top: -10000px; width: 0px;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="true" allowtransparency="true" aria-hidden="true" frameborder="0" id="fb_xdm_frame_https" name="fb_xdm_frame_https" scrolling="no" src="https://s-static.ak.facebook.com/connect/xd_arbiter/4B2NplaqNF3.js?version=41#channel=f21e7c3b94&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.psychologytoday.com" style="border-style: none; border-width: initial; width: 85px;" tabindex="-1" title="Facebook Cross Domain Communication Frame"></iframe></div>
<div style="height: 0px; overflow: hidden; position: absolute; top: -10000px; width: 0px;">
<div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="fb-like fb_iframe_widget" data-action="like" data-href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/science-isnt-golden/201507/new-book-tracks-myriad-ways-mental-health-system-fails" data-layout="button_count" data-share="false" data-show-faces="false" fb-iframe-plugin-query="action=like&app_id=220580041311284&container_width=85&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.psychologytoday.com%2Fblog%2Fscience-isnt-golden%2F201507%2Fnew-book-tracks-myriad-ways-mental-health-system-fails&layout=button_count&locale=en_US&sdk=joey&share=false&show_faces=false" fb-xfbml-state="rendered" style="display: inline-block; position: relative;">
<span style="display: inline-block; height: 20px; position: relative; text-align: justify; vertical-align: bottom; width: 79px;"><iframe allowfullscreen="true" allowtransparency="true" class="" frameborder="0" height="1000px" name="f1497d3b5" scrolling="no" src="https://www.facebook.com/v2.3/plugins/like.php?action=like&app_id=220580041311284&channel=https%3A%2F%2Fs-static.ak.facebook.com%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter%2F4B2NplaqNF3.js%3Fversion%3D41%23cb%3Df239250e44%26domain%3Dwww.psychologytoday.com%26origin%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.psychologytoday.com%252Ff21e7c3b94%26relation%3Dparent.parent&container_width=85&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.psychologytoday.com%2Fblog%2Fscience-isnt-golden%2F201507%2Fnew-book-tracks-myriad-ways-mental-health-system-fails&layout=button_count&locale=en_US&sdk=joey&share=false&show_faces=false" style="border-style: none; border-width: initial; height: 20px; position: absolute; visibility: visible; width: 79px;" title="fb:like Facebook Social Plugin" width="1000px"></iframe></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="region region-content region__content" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, 'DejaVu Sans', sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; width: 639px;">
<div class="block-system-main block block-system" id="block-system-main" style="top: -4px;">
<div class="block__content">
<div class="t7-clear-me" style="clear: both;">
</div>
<div class="node node-blog-entry node-promoted node-1077093 comment-2 clearfix" data-nid="1077093" data-type="blog_entry">
<div class="node__content mode__full">
<div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden" style="line-height: 26px;">
<div class="field__item">
<div style="margin-bottom: 24px;">
Bonnie Burstow’s brilliant, comprehensive, new book, <em>Psychiatry and the Business of Madness,*</em> is part of a tradition of trenchant critiques, including the great feminist psychologist pioneer Phyllis Chesler’s book <em>Women and Madness</em> in 1972; Jeffrey Mousaieff Masson’s <em>The Assault on Truth</em> in 1984; Peter Breggin’s <em>Toxic Psychiatry</em> in 1991; Bob Whitaker’s <em>Mad in America </em>in 2001 and <em>Anatomy of an Epidemic</em> in 2010; and James Davies’ book, <em>Cracked</em>, in 2013. There is the brave work of attorneys Jim Gottstein and Tina Minkowitz, the late anti-electroshock activist Leonard Roy Frank – who taught me never to use the term “ECT,” because the “T” stands for “therapy,” MindFreedom founder David Oaks, Will Hall, the tireless multi-sphere, activist and survivors’ encyclopedia Amy Smith, and many others who work to expose abuses in the systems that are officially supposed to reduce emotional suffering and sometimes do that but often increase it.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 24px;">
I am a clinical and research psychologist and belonged to the American Psychological Association until I resigned because of their allowing psychologists to participate in torture and because of their frantic, well-funded push to get states to allow psychologists to prescribe <a class="inline-links topic-link" href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/psychiatry" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 1px; color: black; padding-bottom: 2px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;" title="Psychology Today looks at psychiatric">psychiatric</a> <a class="inline-links topic-link" href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/psychopharmacology" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 1px; color: black; padding-bottom: 2px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;" title="Psychology Today looks at drugs">drugs</a>. While still a member, I stood outside the annual convention one year and realized I was loathe to enter. Many psychologists and other therapists are humane, respectful, caring, and careful to avoid dogma and dangers to those they try to help. But Burstow shows with scrupulous care the ways that various systems make such therapists all too rare, and she lets those who have been harmed speak up in heartbreaking detail. As a result, instead of reading that Irit Shimrat tore off her clothes and ran down the hall of her apartment building banging on doors to warn people of the dangers or war…and thinking to ourselves, “Well, she was clearly nuts!” Burstow gives us Shimrat’s own words and then points out, in effect, how strange it is that so few of us are in close enough touch with the horrors of war that we bang doors in warning. We would do well to consider this.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 24px;">
Burstow does not romanticize what some people call madness, and she lets us in on the acute fears and confusion and other kinds of suffering that some people experience. Her entire book is aimed at revealing how traditional mental <a class="inline-links topic-link" href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/health" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 1px; color: black; padding-bottom: 2px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;" title="Psychology Today looks at health">health</a> systems and their affiliates (e.g., the diagnostic juggernaut, insurance companies, governments, courts, intake and other official forms, Pharma) too often prevent us from allaying the suffering and way too often make it worse.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 24px;">
The title of Burstow’s book refers to psychiatry, but she describes how also psychologists, social workers, and nurses sometimes reduce suffering but often dehumanize sufferers, drug them, shock them, inflict various kinds of physical and psychological violence on them. Depressingly often, I have also heard <a class="inline-links topic-link" href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/marriage" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 1px; color: black; padding-bottom: 2px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;" title="Psychology Today looks at marriage">marriage</a> and family therapists, counselors, and even clergy – for heaven’s sake, clergy! who are supposed to know oppression and<a class="inline-links topic-link" href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/spirituality" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 1px; color: black; padding-bottom: 2px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;" title="Psychology Today looks at spiritual">spiritual</a> or existential crisis when they see them! -- leaping to assign or perpetuate psychiatric labels, misinterpret behavior in the most bizarre of ways, and push drugs even when they are harmful and isolation. Something is very wrong when a minister describes<a class="inline-links topic-link" href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/grief" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 1px; color: black; padding-bottom: 2px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;" title="Psychology Today looks at grief">grief</a> over the loss of a loved one as a Major Depressive Episode, as the <em>DSM-IV</em> did (on the fourth page of the listing of that category).</div>
<div class="pt-ad pt-ads-300" id="div-gpt-ad-1404853927369-0" style="margin: 0px auto; width: 300px;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 24px;">
Burstow takes us through some of the powerful forces that help maintain a harmful system and, using heartbreaking quotations from those who have been harmed, reveals the human costs. She mentions how media actively promote dangerous so-called treatments, and I want to mention the role of major media in a recent, mysterious failure to report the greatest corruption in the mental health system in decades. Columbia University medical<a class="inline-links topic-link" href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/ethics-and-morality" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 1px; color: black; padding-bottom: 2px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;" title="Psychology Today looks at ethics">ethics</a> expert Dr. David Rothman wrote an expert witness report scrupulously documenting this: In 1995, the very year after <em>DSM-IV</em> appeared, three powerful psychiatrists were paid nearly $1 million by Jansen Pharmaceuticals to write a “Practice Guideline” for treating <a class="inline-links topic-link" href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/conditions/schizophrenia" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 1px; color: black; padding-bottom: 2px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;" title="Psychology Today looks at Schizophrenia">Schizophrenia</a>, and the guideline – as promised – had the conclusion that Jansen’s new drug Risperdal was the best option. As Dr. Rothman noted, this was in utter disregard of what the research showed. Besides the guideline, what the three men did for their pay was to create a detailed program for <a class="inline-links topic-link" href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/consumer-behavior" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 1px; color: black; padding-bottom: 2px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;" title="Psychology Today looks at marketing">marketing</a> Risperdal by – among other things -- bringing hired-gun psychiatrists to give “Continuing <a class="inline-links topic-link" href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/education" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 1px; color: black; padding-bottom: 2px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;" title="Psychology Today looks at Education">Education</a>” courses to promote the drug. Risperdal is one of the most dangerous of all psychiatric drugs. Most people are unaware of this corruption, which I call “Diagnosisgate.”** This is because although there were five major media stories about the Rothman Report, in not one were the three psychiatrists, their “practice guideline,” or their nearly million-dollar pay mentioned. In my article called “Diagnosisgate,” I said it was an unexplained mystery why this was, but despite calling attention to the media’s blackout, that blackout continues.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 24px;">
Another major player in concealing harm is the legislator, because it is so easy to propose laws and earmark funding that perpetuate the traditional approaches, playing into the common <a class="inline-links topic-link" href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/fear" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 1px; color: black; padding-bottom: 2px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;" title="Psychology Today looks at fear">fear</a> that deviating from the “standard of care” – primarily <a class="inline-links topic-link" href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/therapy" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 1px; color: black; padding-bottom: 2px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;" title="Psychology Today looks at psychotherapy">psychotherapy</a> and drugs -- must be dangerous. And in our chapter in <em><a class="inline-links topic-link" href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/bias" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 1px; color: black; padding-bottom: 2px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;" title="Psychology Today looks at Bias">Bias</a> in Psychiatric Diagnosis,</em>*** Jeffrey Poland and I wrote, as does Burstow, about a number of interlocking systems that perpetuate harm in the mental health system, and our focus was on psychiatric diagnosis. We included as the perpetuating entities some of those that Burstow examines, as well as Medicare and Medicaid, contemporary people’s desperate need in their overly busy lives to find silver bullet answers to their problems and a deep-seated and unquestioning belief in science/medicine/technology.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 24px;">
Burstow presents an entire set of wonderful, and wonderfully radical, proposals for transforming the ways we deal with people who suffer emotionally, as she will tell you. I heartily endorse them all, for they are about the importance of <a class="inline-links topic-link" href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/relationships" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 1px; color: black; padding-bottom: 2px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;" title="Psychology Today looks at love">love</a>, respect, compassion, and wholehearted listening to those in our communities…and to strengthening our communities.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 24px;">
I want to highlight both the most fundamental cause of harm and what we can do about it. Every problem in the mental health system begins with psychiatric diagnosis. After all, until they have labeled you mentally ill, they are not supposed to treat you, and once you are labeled, there is little they cannot do to you. As I learned from my two years on two DSM-IV committees, <a class="ext" href="http://www.amazon.com/Bias-Psychiatric-Diagnosis-Paula-Caplan/dp/0765700018" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; color: black; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;" target="_blank">psychiatric diagnoses are unscientific<span class="ext" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: url(https://cdn.psychologytoday.com/sites/all/modules/contrib/extlink/extlink_s.png); background-origin: initial; background-position: 2px 50%; background-repeat: no-repeat; background-size: initial; height: 10px; padding-right: 12px; text-decoration: none; width: 10px;"><span class="element-invisible" style="clip: rect(1px 1px 1px 1px); height: 1px; overflow: hidden; position: absolute !important;">(link is external)</span></span></a>, do not necessarily lead to reduction of suffering, and carry enormous risks of harm, including deprivation of every conceivable human right. “Patients” are socialized to feel <a class="inline-links topic-link" href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/gratitude" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 1px; color: black; padding-bottom: 2px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;" title="Psychology Today looks at grateful">grateful</a> that their alleged mental illness has been named, and they are virtually never informed that getting a label can destroy their lives, so there is no informed consent. Nine people filed complaints about harm from psychiatric diagnosis with the American Psychiatric Association’s ethics committee, and these were dismissed with no attention to their merits. The Civil Rights Office of the US Department of Health and Human Services did the same with complaints that we filed. We have therefore demonstrated that not only is psychiatric diagnosis totally unregulated but that the one private entity and one <a class="inline-links topic-link" href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/politics" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 1px; color: black; padding-bottom: 2px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;" title="Psychology Today looks at government">government</a> entity that by all rights ought to regulate it, redress harm, and prevent future harm, refuse to take a single step to do so.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 24px;">
Many years ago <a class="ext" href="https://www.change.org/p/everyone-who-cares-about-the-harm-done-by-psychiatric-diagnosis-endorse-the-call-for-congressional-hearings-about-psychiatric-diagnosis" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; color: black; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;" target="_blank">I proposed holding Congressional Hearings<span class="ext" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: url(https://cdn.psychologytoday.com/sites/all/modules/contrib/extlink/extlink_s.png); background-origin: initial; background-position: 2px 50%; background-repeat: no-repeat; background-size: initial; height: 10px; padding-right: 12px; text-decoration: none; width: 10px;"><span class="element-invisible" style="clip: rect(1px 1px 1px 1px); height: 1px; overflow: hidden; position: absolute !important;">(link is external)</span></span></a> about psychiatric diagnosis as a major step toward exposing its harms and creating a national conversation about what’s to be done.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 24px;">
Burstow describes hearings about harm in the system and hearings about electroshock that were held in Canada. One thing we can all immediately do is to follow this lead and demand such public hearings in our own countries and on global scales. </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 24px;">
-----------</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 24px;">
*Burstow, Bonnie. (2015). <em>Psychiatry and the business of madness: An ethical and epistemological accounting. </em>New York: Palgrave Macmillan.<a class="ext" href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/psychiatry-and-the-business-of-madness-bonnie-burstow/1120623630?ean=9781137503848" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; color: black; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;" target="_blank">http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/psychiatry-and-the-business-of-madness-b...<span class="ext" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: url(https://cdn.psychologytoday.com/sites/all/modules/contrib/extlink/extlink_s.png); background-origin: initial; background-position: 2px 50%; background-repeat: no-repeat; background-size: initial; height: 10px; padding-right: 12px; text-decoration: none; width: 10px;"><span class="element-invisible" style="clip: rect(1px 1px 1px 1px); height: 1px; overflow: hidden; position: absolute !important;">(link is external)</span></span></a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 24px;">
** Caplan, Paula J. (2015). Diagnosisgate: Conflict of interest at the top of the psychiatric apparatus. <em>APORIA:The Nursing Journal 7</em>(1), 30-41. <a class="ext" href="http://www.oa.uottawa.ca/journals/aporia/articles/2015_01/commentary.pdf" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; color: black; transition: color 0.2s; word-wrap: break-word;" target="_blank">http://www.oa.uottawa.ca/journals/aporia/articles/2015_01/commentary.pdf<span class="ext" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: url(https://cdn.psychologytoday.com/sites/all/modules/contrib/extlink/extlink_s.png); background-origin: initial; background-position: 2px 50%; background-repeat: no-repeat; background-size: initial; height: 10px; padding-right: 12px; text-decoration: none; width: 10px;"><span class="element-invisible" style="clip: rect(1px 1px 1px 1px); height: 1px; overflow: hidden; position: absolute !important;">(link is external)</span></span></a> </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 24px;">
*** Poland, Jeffrey, & Caplan, Paula J. (2004) The deep structure of bias in psychiatric diagnosis. In Paula J. Caplan & Lisa Cosgrove (Eds.), <em>Bias in psychiatric diagnosis</em>. Livingston, NJ: Jason Aronson.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 24px;">
©Copyright 2015 by Paula J. Caplan All rights reserved</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 24px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 24px;">
(original site: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/science-isnt-golden/201507/new-book-tracks-myriad-ways-mental-health-system-fails)</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1855155468838354912.post-70200940479300068332015-05-04T15:06:00.000-07:002015-05-04T15:06:27.693-07:00Mad in America Review <header class="entry-header" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: Merriweather, Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 17px; line-height: 28.8999996185303px; margin: 0px 0px 20px;"><div class="row" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px -15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div class="col-md-12 col-sm-8" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; min-height: 1px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 15px; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline; width: 877.5px;">
<h1 class="" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-size: 38px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: 400; line-height: 58px; margin: 15px 0px 1em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<em style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Psychiatry and the Business of Madness</em>: An Ethical and Epistemological Accounting</h1>
<h2 class="headline-text" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: Lato, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: 100; line-height: 1.4em; margin: -30px 0px 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
</h2>
<div class="byline-dateline" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span class="byline" itemprop="author creator" itemscope="" itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Lato, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-style: inherit; font-weight: 700; line-height: 17px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">By <span class="byline-author" data-byline-name="Philip Hickey, PhD" itemprop="name" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1em; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-transform: uppercase; vertical-align: baseline;"><a class="url fn" href="http://www.madinamerica.com/author/philiphickey/" rel="author" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #005580; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: none; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;" title="Posts by Philip Hickey, PhD">PHILIP HICKEY, PHD</a></span></span></div>
<div class="dateline-wrap" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-size: 0.9em; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: -20px 0px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span class="byline" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Lato, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: 700; line-height: 17px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="http://www.madinamerica.com/news-archives/featured-blogs/" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #005580; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: none; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">Featured Blogs</a> </span><time class="dateline" datetime="April 16, 2015" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: Lato, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 18px; margin-left: 12px;">April 16, 2015</time></div>
<div class="dateline-wrap" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-size: 0.9em; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: -20px 0px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br /></div>
</div>
</div>
</header><div class="row" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: Merriweather, Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 17px; line-height: 28.8999996185303px; margin: 0px -15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br /><div class="col-md-11" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; min-height: 1px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 15px; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline; width: 804.375px;">
<div class="row row-single-content" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: georgia, 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 1rem; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1.4375rem; margin: 2em -15px 0px; max-width: 700px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div class="col-sm-12" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; min-height: 1px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 15px; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline; width: 700px;">
<blockquote style="background: transparent; border-left-color: rgb(238, 238, 238); border-left-width: 5px; border-radius: 0px; border-style: none none none solid; box-shadow: none; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Georgia, 'Bitstream Charter', serif; font-size: 17.5px; font-style: italic; margin: 0px 0px 2em; outline: 0px; padding: 10px 20px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: right; vertical-align: baseline;">
<strong style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Psychiatry-Business-Madness-Epistemological-Accounting/dp/113750384X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1429140363&sr=8-1&keywords=Psychiatry+and+the+Business+of+Madness" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #326891; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: none; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Psychiatry and the Business of Madness</a><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Psychiatry-Business-Madness-Epistemological-Accounting/dp/113750384X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1429140363&sr=8-1&keywords=Psychiatry+and+the+Business+of+Madness" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #326891; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: none; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">:</a></strong></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: right; vertical-align: baseline;">
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Psychiatry-Business-Madness-Epistemological-Accounting/dp/113750384X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1429140363&sr=8-1&keywords=Psychiatry+and+the+Business+of+Madness" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #326891; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: none; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">An Ethical and Epistemological Accounting</a><br style="box-sizing: border-box; clear: both; content: ' '; display: block; height: 1px; margin-bottom: 29px;" /><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: normal; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">by Bonnie Burstow, PhD<br style="box-sizing: border-box; clear: both; content: ' '; display: block; height: 1px; margin-bottom: 29px;" />Published April 1, 2015 by Palgrave Macmillan</span></div>
</blockquote>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
This latest book by Bonnie Burstow, PhD critiques psychiatry, and effectively annihilates any claims that the profession might have had legitimacy.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Bonnie gives us a scholarly, but very readable, account of:</div>
<ul style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 0px 5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<li style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 6px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">the history of psychiatry, ancient and modern</li>
<li style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 6px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">the significance and shortcomings of the DSM</li>
<li style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 6px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">the legal, ethical, and personal ramifications of involuntary "treatment"</li>
<li style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 6px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">the training of psychiatrists and the dynamics underlying their uncritical acceptance of their profession's spurious concepts and destructive treatments</li>
<li style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 6px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">the ways in which non-psychiatrist mental health workers are co-opted into the system, and become, often despite good intentions, supporters and active participants in the psychiatric travesty</li>
<li style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 6px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">the role and tactics of the psycho-pharma industry</li>
<li style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 6px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">the stark, destructive, degrading realities of electric shock "treatment."</li>
</ul>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
In the final chapter, Bonnie offers us a glimpse of what an alternative approach might look like.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Normally when I write a book review, I include some quotes from the work to enable readers to judge for themselves the quality and content of the material. With <em style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Psychiatry-Business-Madness-Epistemological-Accounting/dp/113750384X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1429140363&sr=8-1&keywords=Psychiatry+and+the+Business+of+Madness" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #326891; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: none; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Psychiatry and the Business of Madness</a>,</em> however, this presented a problem, in that virtually every one of the 264 pages of text contains eminently quotable material. Here's a short sample:</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 30px; vertical-align: baseline;">
"… the problems with this institution run so deep that what might be construed as 'improvement' is not and cannot be sufficient." (p 21)</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 30px; vertical-align: baseline;">
"… psychiatry consolidated its power and harnessed the newly acquired credibility of medicine not by being scientific but by <em style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">mimicking</em> the outward trappings of science and medicine." (p 44)</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 30px; vertical-align: baseline;">
"A timely reminder: No biological sign has ever been found for any 'mental disorder.' Correspondingly, there is no known physiological etiology." (p 75)</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 30px; vertical-align: baseline;">
"The concepts of 'open secrets' and 'bad faith' have explanatory value here. An 'open secret' is a truth that everyone knows but does not acknowledge publicly. Everyone knows the secret; everyone knows that <em style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">everyone knows the secret</em>, but except for the odd 'maverick' who can readily be dismissed, everyone respects the secrecy. Let me suggest that there are a number of open secrets in the mental health field. Open secrets that suggested themselves to me as I interviewed practitioners – mainstream practitioners especially – include: There is something wrong with the drugs. There is something wrong with much of the research. There is something wrong with the very way that we are all operating." (p 163-164)</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 30px; vertical-align: baseline;">
"All psychiatric drugs 'work' by obstructing normal brain function, causing dysfunction. All substantially interfere with normal thinking and feeling. All alter the brain's chemistry and structure, to varying degrees, fundamentally damaging the brain. All alter the size of the brain, making it (or some part of it) either expand in size or shrink. All are addictive. All work in ways that make withdrawal difficult, in some cases, arguably, impossible. All cause dysfunctions (and in some cases disorders) in various parts of the body. All work by 'deactivating' to some degree, though some primarily activate. What is experienced as improvement, correspondingly, is invariably one or more of: sedation, stimulation, and the placebo effect. The drugs to varying degree inherently mask the very dysfunctions that they create. They obscure people's appreciation of their psychic state, and by extension, of the damage. What goes along with this, there is a perilously close relationship between the purported 'therapeutic effect' and the 'toxic effect,' with the two at times being identical. The toxic effect itself can manifest itself in mania and psychosis." (p 195-196)</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 30px; vertical-align: baseline;">
"…the pharmaceuticals are the kingpin, the mainstay of the regime of ruling. Successfully problematize that and the edifice crumbles. In this chapter, to an appreciable degree, that has happened, for in the final analysis, however much people may cling to them – and I am in no way denying that there are people who regard them as a lifeline – no medical credibility can be attached to a substance that is not medical, that addresses nothing medical, that gives rise to medical disorders, and whose modus operandi is dysfunction and damage." (p 200)</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 30px; vertical-align: baseline;">
"So what in point of fact does the research establish? In short, that ECT is a profoundly injurious treatment that damages the brain, that substantially impairs memory, that gives rise to global cognitive dysfunction – and in the final analysis, it has no lasting efficacy." (p 214)</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 30px; vertical-align: baseline;">
"While in the final analysis readers must reach their own conclusions, what the logic of this investigation indicates – and indicates powerfully – is that not just parts of psychiatry, but the discipline and the regime as a whole is epistemologically flawed and ethically unacceptable. Nor is it 'fixable,' for the problems are fundamental, at the core. My invitation, accordingly, is that we as a society do what may have once seemed unthinkable – that we acknowledge that our approaches to problems in living and to 'problematic others' are tragically misguided and muster up the courage to begin again." (p 227)</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 30px; vertical-align: baseline;">
"Given that psychiatry is blatantly not the answer to life's woes but indeed, one of the causes thereof, and given that there will always be some need for extensive emotional support, what do we put in its stead? What we concluded is that tinkering will not serve us, that not only must we break with psychiatry, we have to rid ourselves of rule by experts, we need to stop 'othering,' we have to stop imprisoning, and beyond that, we need to fundamentally alter how we live with one another." (p 264)</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
This book is scholarly, in the sense that it examines the issues, painstakingly, fearlessly, and with impeccable logic. But, more than scholarly, it is human-centered and compassionate. There are lots of stories. Some are tragic; some are hopeful; all are instructive. Bonnie has drawn on her own personal and professional experiences to bring the issues vividly to life, and to help us see that the victims of psychiatry are not just the people who have experienced physical damage from the drugs and the electric shocks, but all of us who live in this psychiatrically pathologized, and alienated, world of "us" and "them."</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<em style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Psychiatry and the Business of Madness</em> reads seamlessly, and is a difficult book to put down. I cannot think of a single issue in the psychiatric debate that is not covered – and covered thoroughly and convincingly – within its pages. For those who wish to explore the various topics in greater depth, there are thirteen pages of references.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Please get a copy. Read it, and tell others. This book is a major milestone in the antipsychiatry effort, and stands as a monumental challenge to psychiatry's continued existence as a branch of medicine.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: center; vertical-align: baseline;">
<strong style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .</strong><strong style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"> </strong></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<strong style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Disclosure</strong>: I have no financial links to this book or to any books/materials that I endorse.</div>
<span id="pty_trigger" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1em; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"></span></div>
</div>
<div class="row row-single-bio" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px -15px; max-width: 700px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div class="col-sm-12" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; min-height: 1px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 15px; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline; width: 700px;">
<div class="single-bio" style="border: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; height: auto; margin-bottom: 10px !important; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; outline: 0px; overflow: auto; padding: 10px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<img alt="Philip Hickey, PhD" class="author_photo" id="PhilipHickey" src="http://www.madinamerica.com/custom_template/author_photos/PhilipHickey.jpg" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; display: block; float: left; height: auto; line-height: 1em; margin: 0px 35px 0px 0px; max-width: 100%; padding: 0px; vertical-align: middle;" width="75px" /><a href="http://www.madinamerica.com/author/philiphickey/" rel="author" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #005580; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: none; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;" title="Posts by Philip Hickey, PhD">Philip Hickey, PhD</a><div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-bottom: 30px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<em style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Behaviorism and Mental Health</em>: Philip Hickey is a retired psychologist. He has worked in prisons (UK and US), addiction units, community mental health centers, nursing homes, and in private practice. He and his wife, Nancy, live in Colorado, and have four grown children. His posts can also be seen on his website, <em style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><strong style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="http://behaviorismandmentalhealth.com/" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #005580; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: none; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Behaviorism and Mental Health</a></strong>.</em></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0